| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
...instead of just stating "repetitive dive". As requested by
a user.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
|
|
Fixes #1095
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
If we want to keep the selected dive "close" to where it was before an
operation (whether a delete, or a reload, or something like that), then
the most intuitive thing to do appears to be to select either the same
dive again (if it still exists), or one very close to it in time. This
helper allows us to identify the dive in the current dive list that is
closest to the given time.
We do this in the C code to ensure that we look at all dives in the
dive_table - based on the id that is returned the UI can then figure out
where this dive is currently shown.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
Having subsurface-core as a directory name really messes with
autocomplete and is obviously redundant. Simmilarly, qt-mobile caused an
autocomplete conflict and also was inconsistent with the desktop-widget
name for the directory containing the "other" UI.
And while cleaning up the resulting change in the path name for include
files, I decided to clean up those even more to make them consistent
overall.
This could have been handled in more commits, but since this requires a
make clean before the build, it seemed more sensible to do it all in one.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
Dirk Hohndel
Robert C. Helling