| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Calculate the correct cylinder pressures for rebreather dives with
bailout. Currently the cylinder pressures for a dive are calculated
assuming a single dive mode for that dive. Bailout indroduces more
than one dive mode for a single dive, i.e. transitions from
CCR or PSCR to OC and back. Currently the start and end pressures
for each cylinder are used to interpolate cylinder pressures while that
cylinder is used. However, the different gas consumption rates for
OC, PSCR and CCR are not taken into account in this interpolation
and the cylinder pressure is indicated by an averaged interpolation
accross the rebreather and OC legs of the dive. Consequently the
increased drop in cylinder pressure during OC is not shown. This
PR allows differentiation between CCR/PSCR legs of the dive and
the OC bailout segments, showing realistic interpolation that
indicate the increased rate of gas use during OC.
Signed-off-by: Willem Ferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
|
|
Unused parameters in C are "silenced" by adding UNUSED(x)
Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
|
|
Somehow a whitespace fix snuck in here. Oops.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
It's already used in core/gaspressures.c where it was declared
privately, and we'll have a new user in the profile code, so just
declare it in a proper header file like it should have been.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
So the manual gas pressure case keeps showing issues, and in many ways it
really is a fairly complex thing, since it needs interpolation of the
intermediate pressures - possibly over several gas changes.
So you might have beginning and ending pressures for one cylinder, but
then use another cylinder in between.
We've historically got all the code to do this, but the big rewrite for
multiple cylinder pressures didn't get all the details right, and so
here's a few more fixes for the case that was shown by a dive by Robert
Helling. Hopefully we're approaching the old code situation, except now
with concurrent gas pressure handling support.
Reported-by: Robert Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
This finally handles multiple cylinder pressures, both overlapping and
consecutive, and it seems to work on the nasty cases I've thrown at it.
Want to just track five different cylinders all at once, without any
pesky gas switch events? Sure, you can do that. It will show five
different gas pressures for your five cylinders, and they will go down
as you breathe down the cylinders.
I obviously don't have any real data for that case, but I do have a test
file with five actual cylinders that all have samples over the whole
course of the dive. The end result looks messy as hell, but what did
you expect?
HOWEVER.
The only way to do this sanely was
- actually make the "struct plot_info" have all the cylinder pressures
(so no "sensor index and pressure" - every cylinder has a pressure for
every plot info entry)
This obviously makes the plot_info much bigger. We used to have
MAX_CYLINDERS be a fairly generous 8, which seems sane. The planning
code made that 8 be 20. That seems questionable. But whatever.
The good news is that the plot-info should hopefully get freed, and
only be allocated one dive at a time, so the fact that it is big and
nasty shouldn't be a scaling issue, though.
- the "populate_pressure_information()" function had to be rewritten
quite a bit. The good news is that it's actually simpler now, although
I would not go so far as to really call it simple. It's still
complicated and suble, but now it explicitly just does one cylinder at
a time.
It *used* to have this insanely complicated "keep track of the pressure
ranges for every cylinder at once". I just couldn't stand that model
and keep my sanity, so it now just tracks one cylinder at a time, and
doesn't have an array of live data, instead the caller will just call
it for each cylinder.
- get rid of some of our hackier stuff, like the code that populates the
plot_info data code with the currently selected cylinder number, and
clears out any other pressures. That obviously does *not* work when you
may not have a single primary cylinder any more.
Now, the above sounds like all good things. Yeah, it mostly is.
BUT.
There's a few big downsides from the above:
- there's no sane way to do this as a series of small changes.
The change to make the plot_info take an array of cylinder pressures
rather than the sensor+pressure model really isn't amenable to "fix up
one use at a time". When you switch over to the new data structure
model, you have to switch over to the new way of populating the
pressure ranges. The two just go hand in hand.
- Some of our code *depended* on the "sensor+pressure" model. I fixed all
the ones I could sanely fix. There was one particular case that I just
couldn't sanely fix, and I didn't care enough about it to do something
insane.
So the only _known_ breakage is the "TankItem" profile widget. That's
the bar at the bottom of the profile that shows which cylinder is in
use right now. You'd think that would be trivial to fix up, and yes it
would be - I could just use the regular model of
firstcyl = explicit_first_cylinder(dive, dc)
.. then iterate over the gas change events to see the others ..
but the problem with the "TankItem" widget is that it does its own
model, and it has thrown away the dive and the dive computer
information. It just doesn't even know. It only knows what cylinders
there are, and the plot_info. And it just used to look at the sensor
number in the plot_info, and be done with that. That number no longer
exists.
- I have tested it, and I think the code is better, but hey, it's a
fairly large patch to some of the more complex code in our code base.
That "interpolate missing pressure fields" code really isn't pretty. It
may be prettier, but..
Anyway, without further ado, here's the patch. No sign-off yet, because I
do think people should look and comment. But I think the patch is fine,
and I'll fix anythign that anybody can find, *except* for that TankItem
thing that I will refuse to touch. That class is ugly. It needs to have
access to the actual dive.
Note how it actually does remove more lines than it adds, and that's
despite added comments etc. The code really is simpler, but there may be
cases in there that need more work.
Known missing pieces that don't currently take advantage of concurrent
cylinder pressure data:
- the momentary SAC rate coloring for dives will need more work
- dive merging (but we expect to generally normally not merge dive
computers, which is the main source of sensor data)
- actually taking advantage of different sensor data from different
dive computers
But most of all: Testing. Lots and lots of testing to find all the
corner cases.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
This is a very timid start at making us actually use multiple sensors
without the magical special case for just CCR oxygen tracking.
It mainly does:
- turn the "sample->sensor" index into an array of two indexes, to
match the pressures themselves.
- get rid of dive->{oxygen_cylinder_index,diluent_cylinder_index},
since a CCR dive should now simply set the sample->sensor[] indices
correctly instead.
- in a couple of places, start actually looping over the sensors rather
than special-case the O2 case (although often the small "loops" are
just unrolled, since it's just two cases.
but in many cases we still end up only covering the zero sensor case,
because the CCR O2 sensor code coverage was fairly limited.
It's entirely possible (even likely) that this migth break some existing
case: it tries to be a fairly direct ("stupid") translation of the old
code, but unlike the preparatory patch this does actually does change
some semantics.
For example, right now the git loader code assumes that if the git save
data contains a o2pressure entry, it just hardcodes the O2 sensor index
to 1.
In fact, one issue is going to simply be that our file formats do not
have that multiple sensor format, but instead had very clearly encoded
things as being the CCR O2 pressure sensor.
But this is hopefully close to usable, and I will need feedback (and
maybe test cases) from people who have existing CCR dives with pressure
data.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
We currently carry two pressures around for all the samples and plot
info, but the second pressure is reserved for CCR dives as the O2
cylinder pressure.
That's kind of annoying when we *could* use it for regular sidemount
dives as the secondary pressure.
So start prepping for that instead: don't make it "pressure" and
"o2pressure", make it just be an array of two pressure values.
NOTE! This is purely mindless prepwork. It literally just does a
search-and-replace, keeping the exact same semantics, so "pressure[1]"
is still just O2 pressure.
But at some future date, we can now start using it for a second sensor
value for sidemount instead.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
Not using lrint(f) when converting double/float to int
creates rounding errors.
This error was detected by TestParse::testParseDM4 failure
on Windows. It was creating rounding inconsistencies
on Linux too, see change in TestDiveDM4.xml.
Enable -Wfloat-conversion for gcc version greater than 4.9.0
Signed-off-by: Jeremie Guichard <djebrest@gmail.com>
|
|
Using gcc option "-Wfloat-conversion" is useful to catch
potential conversion errors (where lrint should be used).
rint returns double and still raises the same warning,
this is why this change updates all rint calls to lrint.
In few places, where input type is a float, corresponding
lrinf is used.
Signed-off-by: Jeremie Guichard <djebrest@gmail.com>
|
|
Having subsurface-core as a directory name really messes with
autocomplete and is obviously redundant. Simmilarly, qt-mobile caused an
autocomplete conflict and also was inconsistent with the desktop-widget
name for the directory containing the "other" UI.
And while cleaning up the resulting change in the path name for include
files, I decided to clean up those even more to make them consistent
overall.
This could have been handled in more commits, but since this requires a
make clean before the build, it seemed more sensible to do it all in one.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
Willem Ferguson
jan Iversen
Dirk Hohndel
Linus Torvalds
Jeremie Guichard