aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/core/gaspressures.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-08-23Cleanup: const-ify functions taking pointers to eventsGravatar Berthold Stoeger
This is another entry in the series to make more things "const-clean" with the ultimate goal of merge_dive() take const pointers. This concerns functions taking pointers to events and the fallout from making these const. The somewhat debatable part of this commit might be that get_next_event() is split in a two distinct (const and non-const) versions with different names, since C doesn't allow overloading. The linker should recognize that these functions are identical and remove one of them. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2018-06-08Provide correct cylinder pressures for bailout divesGravatar Willem Ferguson
Calculate the correct cylinder pressures for rebreather dives with bailout. Currently the cylinder pressures for a dive are calculated assuming a single dive mode for that dive. Bailout indroduces more than one dive mode for a single dive, i.e. transitions from CCR or PSCR to OC and back. Currently the start and end pressures for each cylinder are used to interpolate cylinder pressures while that cylinder is used. However, the different gas consumption rates for OC, PSCR and CCR are not taken into account in this interpolation and the cylinder pressure is indicated by an averaged interpolation accross the rebreather and OC legs of the dive. Consequently the increased drop in cylinder pressure during OC is not shown. This PR allows differentiation between CCR/PSCR legs of the dive and the OC bailout segments, showing realistic interpolation that indicate the increased rate of gas use during OC. Signed-off-by: Willem Ferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
2018-05-24core: replace (void) with UNUSED(x) and include ssrf.hGravatar jan Iversen
Unused parameters in C are "silenced" by adding UNUSED(x) Signed-off-by: Jan Iversen <jani@apache.org>
2017-12-17Cleanup: durations are now signedGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Somehow a whitespace fix snuck in here. Oops. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2017-11-17Properly declare 'has_gaschange_event()' functionGravatar Linus Torvalds
It's already used in core/gaspressures.c where it was declared privately, and we'll have a new user in the profile code, so just declare it in a proper header file like it should have been. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-08-26Time is unsigned hereGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2017-08-26Remove some unused variablesGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2017-07-30For more manual gas pressure detailsGravatar Linus Torvalds
So the manual gas pressure case keeps showing issues, and in many ways it really is a fairly complex thing, since it needs interpolation of the intermediate pressures - possibly over several gas changes. So you might have beginning and ending pressures for one cylinder, but then use another cylinder in between. We've historically got all the code to do this, but the big rewrite for multiple cylinder pressures didn't get all the details right, and so here's a few more fixes for the case that was shown by a dive by Robert Helling. Hopefully we're approaching the old code situation, except now with concurrent gas pressure handling support. Reported-by: Robert Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2017-07-27Profile support for multiple concurrent pressure sensorsGravatar Linus Torvalds
This finally handles multiple cylinder pressures, both overlapping and consecutive, and it seems to work on the nasty cases I've thrown at it. Want to just track five different cylinders all at once, without any pesky gas switch events? Sure, you can do that. It will show five different gas pressures for your five cylinders, and they will go down as you breathe down the cylinders. I obviously don't have any real data for that case, but I do have a test file with five actual cylinders that all have samples over the whole course of the dive. The end result looks messy as hell, but what did you expect? HOWEVER. The only way to do this sanely was - actually make the "struct plot_info" have all the cylinder pressures (so no "sensor index and pressure" - every cylinder has a pressure for every plot info entry) This obviously makes the plot_info much bigger. We used to have MAX_CYLINDERS be a fairly generous 8, which seems sane. The planning code made that 8 be 20. That seems questionable. But whatever. The good news is that the plot-info should hopefully get freed, and only be allocated one dive at a time, so the fact that it is big and nasty shouldn't be a scaling issue, though. - the "populate_pressure_information()" function had to be rewritten quite a bit. The good news is that it's actually simpler now, although I would not go so far as to really call it simple. It's still complicated and suble, but now it explicitly just does one cylinder at a time. It *used* to have this insanely complicated "keep track of the pressure ranges for every cylinder at once". I just couldn't stand that model and keep my sanity, so it now just tracks one cylinder at a time, and doesn't have an array of live data, instead the caller will just call it for each cylinder. - get rid of some of our hackier stuff, like the code that populates the plot_info data code with the currently selected cylinder number, and clears out any other pressures. That obviously does *not* work when you may not have a single primary cylinder any more. Now, the above sounds like all good things. Yeah, it mostly is. BUT. There's a few big downsides from the above: - there's no sane way to do this as a series of small changes. The change to make the plot_info take an array of cylinder pressures rather than the sensor+pressure model really isn't amenable to "fix up one use at a time". When you switch over to the new data structure model, you have to switch over to the new way of populating the pressure ranges. The two just go hand in hand. - Some of our code *depended* on the "sensor+pressure" model. I fixed all the ones I could sanely fix. There was one particular case that I just couldn't sanely fix, and I didn't care enough about it to do something insane. So the only _known_ breakage is the "TankItem" profile widget. That's the bar at the bottom of the profile that shows which cylinder is in use right now. You'd think that would be trivial to fix up, and yes it would be - I could just use the regular model of firstcyl = explicit_first_cylinder(dive, dc) .. then iterate over the gas change events to see the others .. but the problem with the "TankItem" widget is that it does its own model, and it has thrown away the dive and the dive computer information. It just doesn't even know. It only knows what cylinders there are, and the plot_info. And it just used to look at the sensor number in the plot_info, and be done with that. That number no longer exists. - I have tested it, and I think the code is better, but hey, it's a fairly large patch to some of the more complex code in our code base. That "interpolate missing pressure fields" code really isn't pretty. It may be prettier, but.. Anyway, without further ado, here's the patch. No sign-off yet, because I do think people should look and comment. But I think the patch is fine, and I'll fix anythign that anybody can find, *except* for that TankItem thing that I will refuse to touch. That class is ugly. It needs to have access to the actual dive. Note how it actually does remove more lines than it adds, and that's despite added comments etc. The code really is simpler, but there may be cases in there that need more work. Known missing pieces that don't currently take advantage of concurrent cylinder pressure data: - the momentary SAC rate coloring for dives will need more work - dive merging (but we expect to generally normally not merge dive computers, which is the main source of sensor data) - actually taking advantage of different sensor data from different dive computers But most of all: Testing. Lots and lots of testing to find all the corner cases. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2017-07-21Start cleaning up sensor indexing for multiple sensorsGravatar Linus Torvalds
This is a very timid start at making us actually use multiple sensors without the magical special case for just CCR oxygen tracking. It mainly does: - turn the "sample->sensor" index into an array of two indexes, to match the pressures themselves. - get rid of dive->{oxygen_cylinder_index,diluent_cylinder_index}, since a CCR dive should now simply set the sample->sensor[] indices correctly instead. - in a couple of places, start actually looping over the sensors rather than special-case the O2 case (although often the small "loops" are just unrolled, since it's just two cases. but in many cases we still end up only covering the zero sensor case, because the CCR O2 sensor code coverage was fairly limited. It's entirely possible (even likely) that this migth break some existing case: it tries to be a fairly direct ("stupid") translation of the old code, but unlike the preparatory patch this does actually does change some semantics. For example, right now the git loader code assumes that if the git save data contains a o2pressure entry, it just hardcodes the O2 sensor index to 1. In fact, one issue is going to simply be that our file formats do not have that multiple sensor format, but instead had very clearly encoded things as being the CCR O2 pressure sensor. But this is hopefully close to usable, and I will need feedback (and maybe test cases) from people who have existing CCR dives with pressure data. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2017-07-20Unify sample pressure and o2pressure as pressure[2] arrayGravatar Linus Torvalds
We currently carry two pressures around for all the samples and plot info, but the second pressure is reserved for CCR dives as the O2 cylinder pressure. That's kind of annoying when we *could* use it for regular sidemount dives as the secondary pressure. So start prepping for that instead: don't make it "pressure" and "o2pressure", make it just be an array of two pressure values. NOTE! This is purely mindless prepwork. It literally just does a search-and-replace, keeping the exact same semantics, so "pressure[1]" is still just O2 pressure. But at some future date, we can now start using it for a second sensor value for sidemount instead. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2017-04-29Add SPDX header to remaining core filesGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2017-03-09Fix potential double/float to int rounding errorsGravatar Jeremie Guichard
Not using lrint(f) when converting double/float to int creates rounding errors. This error was detected by TestParse::testParseDM4 failure on Windows. It was creating rounding inconsistencies on Linux too, see change in TestDiveDM4.xml. Enable -Wfloat-conversion for gcc version greater than 4.9.0 Signed-off-by: Jeremie Guichard <djebrest@gmail.com>
2017-03-08Change calls to rint into lrint avoiding conversion warningsGravatar Jeremie Guichard
Using gcc option "-Wfloat-conversion" is useful to catch potential conversion errors (where lrint should be used). rint returns double and still raises the same warning, this is why this change updates all rint calls to lrint. In few places, where input type is a float, corresponding lrinf is used. Signed-off-by: Jeremie Guichard <djebrest@gmail.com>
2016-04-04Move subsurface-core to core and qt-mobile to mobile-widgetsGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Having subsurface-core as a directory name really messes with autocomplete and is obviously redundant. Simmilarly, qt-mobile caused an autocomplete conflict and also was inconsistent with the desktop-widget name for the directory containing the "other" UI. And while cleaning up the resulting change in the path name for include files, I decided to clean up those even more to make them consistent overall. This could have been handled in more commits, but since this requires a make clean before the build, it seemed more sensible to do it all in one. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>