aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/core/subsurface-qt/DiveListNotifier.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-10-26Undo: turn dive- and trip-fields into flagsGravatar Berthold Stoeger
The divesEdited signal sends the changed field as a parameter. Since some undo-commands change multiple fields, this led to numerous signals for a single command. This in turn would lead to multiple profile-reloads and statistic recalculations. Therefore, turn the enum into a bitfield. For simplicity, provide a constructor that takes classical flags and turns them into the bitfield. This is necessary because C-style named initialization is only supported on C++20 onward! Is this somewhat overengineered? Yes, maybe. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-10-26Desktop: make salinity a field known to the undo systemGravatar Berthold Stoeger
The undo system sets updates individual dive fields on redo respectively undo. Make salinity such a field, since it is changed on replanning a dive. To do this, break out the "update salinity" functionality into its own function, add an entry to the DiveField enum and add the corresponding switch-case. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-06-23Cleanup: unify selection signalsGravatar Berthold Stoeger
For historic reasons, there where three distinct signals concerning dive-selection from the undo-machinery: 1) divesSelected: sent newly selected dives 2) currentDiveChanged: sent if the current dive changed 3) selectionChanged: sent at the end of a command if either the selection or the current dive changed Since now the undo-commands do a full reset of the selection, merge these three signals into a single signal. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-06-23Undo: unify selection behavior in dive-list commandsGravatar Berthold Stoeger
Some commands tried to retain the current selection on undo/redo, others set the selection to the modified dives. The latter was introduced because it was easier in some cases, but it is probably more user-friendly because the user gets feedback on the change. Therefore, unify to always select the affected dives on undo()/redo(). Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-06-23Undo: don't send signals batched by tripGravatar Berthold Stoeger
Since the default view is batched by trips, signals were sent trip-wise. This seemed like a good idea at first, but when more and more parts used these signals, it became a burden. Therefore push the batching to the part of the code where it is needed: the trip view. The divesAdded and divesDeleted are not yet converted, because these are combined with trip addition/deletion. This should also be detangled, but not now. Since the dive-lists were sorted in the processByTrip function, the dive-list model now does its own sorting. This will have to be audited. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-06-19Undo: sort dives by dive_less_than() in signalsGravatar Berthold Stoeger
In signals dives were sorted by date. This criterion is not be unique. Therefore sort by the dive_less_than() function of the core to avoid any inconsistencies between the Qt-models and the core data. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-06-15Undo: hide multi-dive-edit warning message on subsequent editGravatar Berthold Stoeger
When a different field is edited, hide any old multi-dive-edit warning message. The reason is that we might want to add an "undo" button to the message. But this will undo the wrong command if we don't hide the message. Sadly, this means that we can't use animated show / hide, because an animatedHide() followed immediately by an animatedShow() does not necessarily show the message. In other words, and animatedShow() does not interupt a started animatedHide()!? Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-05-15Convert the atmospheric pressure in the Information Tab to an editable fieldGravatar willemferguson
The Information tab shows the atmospheric pressure. Make this value editable and also ensure that changes to it are undo-able. Signed-off-by: willemferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
2019-04-12Undo: implement undo of dive trip editingGravatar Berthold Stoeger
This is copying the dive editing code. It uses an OO design with virtual functions for getting and setting the values. It doesn't use templates though, as both fields of strig type. This feels a bit over-engineered, but it is 1) consistent with the dive edit code and 2) the number / types of dive trip fields might increase. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-04-12Undo: update cylinder and weight models on pasteGravatar Berthold Stoeger
When pasting (or undoing paste) the cylinders or weights may change. Send the appropriate signals and update the models accordingly. Currently, this means copying from current dive to displayed dive, but hopefully we can get rid of "displayed_dive" in the not so distant future. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-04-12Undo: update dive list after edit commandGravatar Berthold Stoeger
The dive list was not updated automatically when an edit command was executed. There was already a signal to do that, viz. divesChanged(). But that signal worked by-trip and didn't have a dive-field specifier. The edit-commands used the divesEdited() signal that isn't by-trip but has a dive-field specifier. Unify these two signals to be by-trip and with dive-field specifier. This needs common code to generate the by-trip list that is moved to a command_private.h header. Since there might now be multiple signals (one per trip) actually check in the main-tab whether the current trip is affected to avoid multiple update of fields. This has the positive(?) effect of not doing any update if the current dive isn't changed. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-04-12Undo: implement undo of depth and duration editingGravatar Berthold Stoeger
This was a bit different from the other editing commands: 1) Only the current dive is edited not all selected dives. Therefore, create a function that turns the current dive into a one-element list. 2) The profile has to be replot. Here, likewise, create a function to do that. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-04-12Undo: implement undo of dive site editingGravatar Berthold Stoeger
This one is a bit more tricky. There are two modes: set dive site and set newly created dive site. This is realized using an OO model with derived classed. Quite convoluted - but it seems to work. Moreover, editing a dive site is not simply setting a value, but the list of dives in a dive site has to be kept up to date. Finally, we have to inform the dive site list of the changed number of dives. Therefore add a new signal diveSiteDivesChanged. To send only one signal per dive site, hook into the undo() and redo() functions and call the functions of the base class there. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-04-12Undo: update notes field if changed by undo commandsGravatar Berthold Stoeger
To keep the UI in a consistent state, update the notes field if it is changed by an undo command. To that purpose, add a new signal to diveListNotifier with a list of dives and a field-id as payload. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-04-12Undo: Implement undo of dive site name editingGravatar Berthold Stoeger
Implement an undo command that edits the name of a dive site. Connect it to the dive site table, so that names can be edited directly in the table. Send signals on undo / redo so that the dive site table and the dive site edit widget can be updated. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-04-12Dive site: inform model of dive site addition / deletionGravatar Berthold Stoeger
Introduce two DiveListNotifier signals which are sent by the undo commands if dives are added to / removed from the core. The signal has the dive site and the index in the global dive site table as payload. Thus, the model has only to remove the appropriate rows. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2019-04-12Undo: keep frontend informed of changes to dive site countGravatar Berthold Stoeger
Add a new signal to DiveListNotifier. Send signal if dives are added or removed and therefore the dive count of a dive site changes. The dive sites are collected and the signal is sent at the end of the command. Add code to update the table view. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2018-10-11Undo: select dives after add, remove, merge, split dive commandsGravatar Berthold Stoeger
Select the proper dives after the add, remove, split and merge dives commands on undo *and* redo. Generally, select the added dives. For undo of add, remember the pre-addition selection. For redo of remove, select the closest dive to the first removed dive. The biggest part of the commit is the signal-interface between the dive commands and the dive-list model and dive-list view. This is done in two steps: 1) To the DiveTripModel in batches of trips. The dive trip model transforms the dives into indices. 2) To the DiveListView. The DiveListView has to translate the DiveTripModel indexes to actual indexes via its QSortFilterProxy- model. For code-reuse, derive all divelist-changing commands from a new base-class, which has a flag that describes whether the divelist changed. The helper functions which add and remove dives are made members of the base class and set the flag is a selected dive is added or removed. To properly detect when the current dive was deleted it became necessary to turn the current dive from an index to a pointer, because indices are not stable. Unfortunately, in some cases an index was expected and these places now have to transform the dive into an index. These should be converted in due course. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2018-10-11Dive list view: replace signal-magic by flagGravatar Berthold Stoeger
In DiveListView, we have a very fundamental problem: When On the one hand, we get informed of user-selection in the DiveListView::selectionChanged() slot. This has to set the correct flags in the C-backend. On the other hand, sometimes we have to set the selection programatically, e.g. when selecting a trip. This is done by calling QItemSelectionModel::select(). But: this will *also* call into the above slot, in which we can't tell whether it was a user interaction or an internal call. This can lead to either infinite loops or very inefficient behavior, because the current dive is set numerous times. The current code is aware of that and disconnects the corresponding signal. This is scary, as these signals are set internally by the model and view. Replace this by a global "command executing" flag in DiveListNotifier. The flag is set using a "marker" class, which resets the flag once it goes out of scope (cf. RAII pattern). In DiveListView, only process a selection if the flag is not set. Otherwise simply call the QTreeView base class, to reflect the new selection in the UI. To have a common point for notifications of selection changes, add such a signal to DiveListNotifier. This signal will be used by the DiveListView as well as the Command-objects. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
2018-10-11Dive list: implement proper Qt-model semantics for DiveTripModelGravatar Berthold Stoeger
Previously, each dive-list modifying function would lead to a full model reset. Instead, implement proper Qt-model semantics using beginInsertRows()/endInsertRows(), beginRemoveRows()/ endRemoveRows(), dataChange(). To do so, a DiveListNotifer singleton is generatated, which broadcasts all changes to the dive-list. Signals are sent by the commands and received by the DiveTripModel. Signals are batched by dive-trip. This seems to be an adequate compromise for the two kinds of list-views (tree and list). In the common usecase mostly dives of a single trip are affected. Thus, batching of dives is performed in two positions: - At command-level to batch by trip - In DiveTripModel to feed batches of contiguous elements to Qt's begin*/end*-functions. This is conceptually simple, but rather complex code. To avoid repetition of complex loops, the batching is implemented in templated-functions, which are passed lambda-functions, which are called for each batch. Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>