| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Since all commands now fully reset the selection, there is no point
in keeping track of whether the selection changed on addition or
removal of dives. This can be done in the function that sets the
selection.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
When deleting a dive computer, don't just show the first
dive computer, but the next one in the list (if it exists).
Moreover, on undo jump to the previously shown dive computer.
Do this by keeping track of the before and after dive computer
number in the undo command.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Simply reuse the code for "move dive computer" by creating
a DiveComputerBase base class.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Instead of the elegant solution that just modifies the dive,
keep two copies and add either the old or the new copy. This
is primitive, but it trivially keeps the dives in the right order.
The order might change on renumbering the dive computers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
When adding dives in an undo command, the index is saved in the
command. This seemed logical at first, because why calculate the
index more than once? But actually it made the code rather subtle
and brittle when multiple dives were added.
Moreover, this is a pointless optimization, as it doesn't optimize
the common case (only one execution).
Remove this for now and calculate the index on every execution. If
it ever turns out to be a bottle neck, it will be much more effective
to turn the linear search of the index into a binary search. A
further sensible optimization would be inserting in batches.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Instead of letting the user edit the fields before adding a dive,
simply add an empty dive. Thus, the ADD mode of the main tab can
be removed.
Constructing a new dive with default-depth and making sure that
the dive is displayed correctly is very subtle. This all needs
to be detangled in due course.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Add a new signal to DiveListNotifier. Send signal if dives are
added or removed and therefore the dive count of a dive site
changes. The dive sites are collected and the signal is sent
at the end of the command.
Add code to update the table view.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Instead of setting dive->dive_site directly, call the
add_dive_to_dive_site() and unregister_dive_from_dive_site()
functions. In the parser this turned out to be a bit tricky.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
If a dive site was added for a new dive, remove it on undo.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
As opposed to dive trips, dive sites were always directly added
to the global table, even on import. Instead, parse the divesites
into a distinct table and merge them on import.
Currently, this does not do any merging of dive sites, i.e. dive
sites are considered as either equal or different. Nevertheless,
merging of data should be rather easy to implement and simply
follow the code of the dive merging.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Allow splitting out a dive computer into a distinct dive. This
is realized by generating a base class from SplitDive.
This turned out to be more cumbersome than expected: we don't
know a-priori which of the split dives will come first. Since
the undo-command saves the indices where the dives will be insert,
these have to be calculated. This is an premature optimization,
which makes more pain than necessary. Let's remove it and
simply determine the insertion index when executing the command.
Original code by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
process_imported_dives() takes four boolean parameters. Replace these
by flags. This makes the function calls much more descriptive. Morover,
it becomes easier to add or remove flags.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
If this flag is set, dives that are not assigned to a trip will
be assigned to a new trip. This flag is set if the user checked
"add to new trip" in the download dialog of the desktop version.
Currently this is a no-op as the dives will already have been
added to a new trip by the downloading code. This will be removed
in a subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
DiveListBase had an explicit constructor that initialized the
"firstExecution" member variable. The latter was a development-
artifact that was never used. Remove the member and the constructor.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
On desktop, replace all add_imported_dives() calls by a new undo-command.
This was rather straight forward, as all the preparation work was done
in previous commits.
By using an undo-command, a full UI-reset can be avoided, making the UI
react smoother.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Trips were added to the core with the first dive of that trip.
With the recent changes that keep trips ordered by first dive,
this became counter-productive. Keeping a consistent state at
all times would mean resorting the trip table for every dive
that is added.
Instead, add all dives to a trip and *then* add the trip to the
core. Change the data-structures to not register trips-to-be-added
with individual dives, but keep them in a separate vector for
each undo command.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Planned dives were still added by directly calling core code.
This could confuse the undo-machinery, leading to crashes.
Instead, use the proper undo-command. The problem is that as
opposed to the other AddDive-commands, planned dives may
belong to a trip. Thus, the interface to the AddDive command
was changed to respect the divetrip field. Make sure that
the other callers reset that field (actually, it should never
be set). Add a comment describing the perhaps surprising
interface (the passed-in dive, usually displayed dive, is
reset).
Moreover, a dive cloned in the planner is not assigned a
new number. Thus, add an argument to the AddDive-command,
which expresses whether a new number should be generated
for the to-be-added dive.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The MergeDives and SplitDive commands used addDive() and removeDive()
calls to manage their dives. Unfortunately, these calls don't send
the proper signals and thus the dive-list was not updated. Instead,
use one- and two-element vectors, which are passed to addDives()
and removeDives() [note the plural].
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Select the proper dives after the add, remove, split and merge
dives commands on undo *and* redo. Generally, select the added
dives. For undo of add, remember the pre-addition selection.
For redo of remove, select the closest dive to the first removed
dive.
The biggest part of the commit is the signal-interface between
the dive commands and the dive-list model and dive-list view.
This is done in two steps:
1) To the DiveTripModel in batches of trips. The dive trip model
transforms the dives into indices.
2) To the DiveListView. The DiveListView has to translate the
DiveTripModel indexes to actual indexes via its QSortFilterProxy-
model.
For code-reuse, derive all divelist-changing commands from a new base-class,
which has a flag that describes whether the divelist changed. The helper
functions which add and remove dives are made members of the base class and
set the flag is a selected dive is added or removed.
To properly detect when the current dive was deleted it
became necessary to turn the current dive from an index
to a pointer, because indices are not stable.
Unfortunately, in some cases an index was expected and these
places now have to transform the dive into an index. These
should be converted in due course.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Now, that pointers to dives are stable, we might just as well
use dive * instead of the unique-id. This also affects the
merge-dive command, as this uses the same renumbering machinery.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
If the autogroup flag is set, search for appropriate trips in
DiveAdd() and add the dive to this trip. If no trip exists, add
a new trip.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Previously, each dive-list modifying function would lead to a
full model reset. Instead, implement proper Qt-model semantics
using beginInsertRows()/endInsertRows(), beginRemoveRows()/
endRemoveRows(), dataChange().
To do so, a DiveListNotifer singleton is generatated, which
broadcasts all changes to the dive-list. Signals are sent by
the commands and received by the DiveTripModel. Signals are
batched by dive-trip. This seems to be an adequate compromise
for the two kinds of list-views (tree and list). In the common
usecase mostly dives of a single trip are affected.
Thus, batching of dives is performed in two positions:
- At command-level to batch by trip
- In DiveTripModel to feed batches of contiguous elements
to Qt's begin*/end*-functions.
This is conceptually simple, but rather complex code. To avoid
repetition of complex loops, the batching is implemented in
templated-functions, which are passed lambda-functions, which
are called for each batch.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
This refactors the undo-commands (which are now only "commands").
- Move everything in namespace Command. This allows shortening of
names without polluting the global namespace. Moreover, the prefix
Command:: will immediately signal that the undo-machinery is
invoked. This is more terse than UndoCommands::instance()->...
- Remove the Undo in front of the class-names. Creating an "UndoX"
object to do "X" is paradoxical.
- Create a base class for all commands that defines the Qt-translation
functions. Thus all translations end up in the "Command" context.
- Add a workToBeDone() function, which signals whether this should be
added to the UndoStack. Thus the caller doesn't have to check itself
whether this any work will be done. Note: Qt5.9 introduces "setObsolete"
which does the same.
- Split into public and internal header files. In the public header
file only export the function calls, thus hiding all implementation
details from the caller.
- Split in different translation units: One for the stubs, one for
the base classes and one for groups of commands. Currently, there
is only one class of commands: divelist-commands.
- Move the undoStack from the MainWindow class into commands_base.cpp.
If we want to implement MDI, this can easily be moved into an
appropriate Document class.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
Berthold Stoeger