Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This is just in case I end up doing the graying out of implicit pressure
information: I wanted to clean things up a bit first.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
NOTE! When *editing* the cylinder data, the only thing shown is the
non-sample pressure. So the cylinder editing widget will show zero for
start/end pressure for a dive that has pressure saples without any
manually set pressure data.
This is intentional, so that you can clearly see that this is not a set
value. But it may be that we should gray out the spinputton and have an
"edit value" checkbox or something to make it really obvious.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
.. although in that case we can only ever show the volume in liters, and
cannot do a conversion to cubic feet even if the user has set imperial
units.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Amazing at how many spots we are re-implementing the wheel.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
I'm amazed at how many spots we were doing conversions - some of them
subtly different than others.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
This makes us fill in the size/pressure data for a cylinder even if we
just type the name (rather than pick an entry from the list)
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This allows us to start typing the cylinder description and we'll get a
matching list that we can select. This is similar to selecting one from
the model, and works in addition to the explicit selection.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This way the cylinder model list will contain all the different
cylinders that we have ever seen, rather than only containing the models
that we have *edited*.
That makes it much more practical to add new dives with the same
cylinders that we've used before, because now those cylinders will show
up as cylinder models even if we haven't looked and edited the old dives
first.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The cylinder model doesn't contain the start/end pressures, they just
contain the cylinder type information. So trying to read the start and
end pressure from the cylinder model change callback is totally bogus.
We need to set the start/end pressures from the cylinder info when we
create the cylinder widget, and not touch them when the type changes.
So split up the "set_cylinder_spinbuttons()" function in two: one that
sets the type information, and one that sets the start/end pressure.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Repainting the dive will end up touching the cylinder list store, so we
should finish setting the cylinder info before we repaint it.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Those changes may have changed cylinder sizes and beginning/end
pressures, so the dive profile and SAC rate may be different.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This finally allows you to set the start/end pressures by hand.
HOWEVER! Right now, if we have samples with pressures, those samples
will always end up overriding anything you set manually. Which can be
very annoying if your wireless air integration fails halfway through.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Instead of having to keep the index up-to-date as we edit entries
around, just figure out the entry index from the model itself. Gtk
seems to make it unnecessarily hard, but what else is new?
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
You can still just select them and click the "Edit" button too, but now
you can double-click them (or select them and press "enter") for editing
too.
It seems to be the natural interface.
Also, remove the index column (that was there for debugging), and add
grid lines.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Instead of passing it the model and iterator (which requires that we
create the new entry for an 'add' event even if we then cancel the
operation), just make the caller do the final cylinder list update.
This way we can make 'add' work more sanely: if you cancel the add, we
now do not create an empty cylinder entry at the end.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
It used to just update the cylinder list widget data, not the actual
dive information.
It still needs an "accept or cancel" dialog, I suspect.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This currently only does the same old things we used to do (so still no
start/end pressure or trimix support), but despite that this is already
more flexible than the old model:
- we can now add new cylinders, rather than just edit the information of
the first two cylinders of the dive
- because the cylinder editing is being done in a edit dialog, it is
now much more reasonable to use multiple lines and expand all the
things we can edit.
But to actually make this fully fledged, we'll need to add all the other
info to the cylinder edit dialog, and probably add a confirmation dialog
for the "delete cylinder" case too.
Oh, and right now deleting a cylinder doesn't mark the dive info changed.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
We don't actually fill the widget info correctly yet, nor do we take the
actual size from the changes, but this starts to hook things up.
Soon.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This is totally useless since you cannot actually *edit* the resulting
new dive yet, but we'll get there. And this already conceptually shows
a capability that we didn't use to have with the old interface.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
They are only sensitive when there is a cylinder selected.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This leaves the actual editing code unconnected, so now you can only see
the cylinder information, not actually edit it. However, with the big
re-organization I really do want to have this as a half-way point where
I have created the new cylinder tree-view.
I now need to connect the "add/edit" buttons to dialogs that then use
the editing widgets - so I've left that widget code around, because I'll
be able to reuse a lot of it. Not all, but the cylinder type model code
in particular will be re-used pretty much as-is.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
We don't handle doubles any different than single tanks - so while
200 cuft was a sane maximum size for a tank, once you dive with
doubles this logic fails.
We may or may not decide to implement special handling for doubles at some
point, but for now simply allow for tanks all the way up to double-150.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
That's the one I should have started with.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
The following are UI toolkit specific:
gtk-gui.c - overall layout, main window of the UI
divelist.c - list of dives subsurface maintains
equipment.c - equipment / tank information for each dive
info.c - detailed dive info
print.c - printing
The rest is independent of the UI:
main.c i - program frame
dive.c i - creates and maintaines the internal dive list structure
libdivecomputer.c
uemis.c
parse-xml.c
save-xml.c - interface with dive computers and the XML files
profile.c - creates the data for the profile and draws it using cairo
This commit should contain NO functional changes, just moving code around
and a couple of minor abstractions.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
Passing it around is just annoying, and we only ever have one. Let's
not burden all the users with the silly thing.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
It's too damn easy to make mistakes and not even notice them (odd gtk
widget selection and keyboard input), or just start editing a cylinder
thing and realize it was wrong.
So instead of always saving the equipment information implicitly, add
explicit "Apply" and "Cancel" buttons that save the information (or
re-load it from the dive data structure)
So now you need to press an extra button for your changes to *really*
take effect. It can be a bit annoying, but it's better than the silent
accidental equipment change that could happen before.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Now we always create the MAX_CYLINDER sets of cylinder widgets. But we
don't actually pack them into the frame - that's a separate phase.
Right now we still do the stupid "always just pack two cylinders" thing,
but the idea is that we can pack just as many as the dive needs on a
per-dive basis.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This just always shows two cylinders, which is obviously bogus, but it's
a good test-case for the multi-cylinder case.
I need to figure out how to dynamically show the right number of
cylinders, but that also involves the notion of adding a cylinder in
order to fill out information that didn't use to exist.
That's lower priority - now the infrastructure seems to be there.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Ok, now we have an array of them, and most of the time we pass the right
pointer back and forth.
There's still a couple of places that hardcode "gtk_cylinder[0]" as the
data, but by now they are mostly things that should iterate over all the
cylinders.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Create a "struct cylinder_widget" so that when we handle multiple
cylinders, we can match them up with the actual cylinder data;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Let's try to be consistent about this. Make the parent of each widget
be a box. Maybe the frames come with boxes, but since I have no clue
about gtk, I'm going to just always create them by hand.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Grey out the nitrox value unless the user explicitly checks the checkbox.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
We really do want to "pack" them, rather than use up the whole size. I
think.
I may end up playing around more with this.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This adds a few more predefined cylinder types to the static list, but
perhaps more importantly, if we try to show a cylinder description that
we haven't seen before, we automatically add that description to the
list as well.
This way, if people have their own cylinder types, our cylinder
management will automatically figure them out and make it easy to enter
them.
NOTE! It might be best to add the new cylinder description at dive log
load time, rather than at 'show' time.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
We also need to actually fill the model store with the cylinder models
we have in our dive lists to begin with.
This makes it all *trivial* to add a new cylinder model: just use a new
description, fill in the size and working pressure, and you're done.
The type automatically gets filled in, unless that description already
existed (in which case we leave it alone).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
If the output units are set to cuft and psi, then we should show the
cylinder size and pressure properly.
NOTE! In the absense of pressure data, we *always* show the cylinder
volume in liter. There's no way to convert it to imperial units, since
the imperial units are not in physical size, but in air volume
normalized to surface pressure..
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
It seems to be sufficiently useful to be worth updating the dive
information now.
This still doesn't handle multiple cylinders in any way. I need to
think about the interface for that.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Not quite there yet, though. And never mind multiple cylinders..
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This doesn't actually change the cylinder type info in the dive, because
it's too broken for that. Instead it prints out what it would change
things to.
The gtk2 notion of text input focus is *really* odd. Why is the
cylinder type sometimes selected, and sometimes not?
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Make it about general equipment management, and start hooking up
functions to show new equipment information when changing dives (and to
flush changes to equipment information for the previously active dive).
Nothing is hooked up yet, and it's now showing just one (really big)
cylinder choice, so this is all broken. But it should make it possible
to at least get somewhere some day.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|