| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The suunto xml is just completely crazy. What's the helium percentage
companion to "o2pct"? Would it be "hepct"? No. It's "hepct_0".
Ok, so they didn't number the first o2pct, which could be seen as sane:
that's the only mix value that should always exist. And they clearly
started their indexing with 0. So with multiple mixes, you'd then
expect "o2pct_1" and "hepct_1", right?
Wrong! Because XML people are crazy, the second O2 mix percentage is
obviously "o2pct_2". So the O2 percentages are one-based, with an
implicit one. But the He percentages are zero-based with an explicit
zero. So the second mix is "o2pct_2" and "hepct_1".
I'd like to ask what drugs Suunto people are on, but hey, it's a Finnish
company. No need to ask. Vodka explains everything. LOTS AND LOTS OF
VODKA.
In comparison, the libdivecomputer output is nice and sane, and uses a
'gasmix' node. Of course, now we have so many different XML nesting
nodes to check that I just made it an array of different noces. That
also allows me to mark the suunto case, so that we only do the "check
for crazy alcoholic xml entries" when it's a suunto file.
The "type of file" thing is probably a good idea for deciding on default
units too. Some day.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
I'll start doing some kind of "save unparsed things as extended items"
thing, and the ignore rules were just there to get rid of some of the
noise from early parsing.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This requires us to change the way we match things up, because now we
can have things like
dives.dive.sample.event.time
and
dives.dive.sample.time
and they are different things (that "sample.event.time" is a 'time'
property of the 'event').
Now, this is always going to be ambiguous, since our linearized name of
the xml doesn't really care whether it's a xml node "child" or a
"property", but quite frankly, I don't care. XML just isn't worth the pain.
In fact, maybe this ambiguity can end up being a good thing. We will
parse these two different lines of XML the same way:
<dive><sample><time>50</time><depth>10.8</depth></sample></dive>
<dive><sample time="50" depth="10.8"></sample></dive>
and the attribute approach seems to be the nicer one. Maybe I'll use
that for the output format.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The executable is now called 'divelog'. If this gets useful enough to
actually *use*, I guess I'll have to come up with a real name some day.
Add a silly README, rename 'parse' to 'parse-xml'.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
Linus Torvalds