summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/profile.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-01-25Remove some unnecessary variable initializationsGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Not really bugs, just wasted. They clutter up the output of static analysis with cppcheck. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-24Fix overly complicated and fragile "same_cylinder" logicGravatar Linus Torvalds
The plot-info per-event 'same_cylinder' logic was fragile, and caused us to not print the beginning pressure of the first cylinder. In particular, there was a nasty interaction with not all plot entries having pressures, and the whole logic that avoid some of the early plot entries because they are fake entries that are just there to make sure that we don't step off the edge of the world. When we then only do certain things on the particular entries that don't have the same cylinder as the last plot entry, things don't always happen like they should. Fix this by: - get rid of the computed "same_cylinder" state entirely. All the cases where we use it, we might as well just look at what the last cylinder we used was, and thus "same_cylinder" is just about testing the current cylinder index against that last index. - get rid of some of the edge conditions by just writing the loops more clearly, so that they simply don't have special cases. For example, instead of setting some "last_pressure" for a cylinder at cylinder changes, just set the damn thing on every single sample. The last pressure will automatically be the pressure we set last! The code is simpler and more straightforward. So this simplifies the code and just makes it less fragile - it doesn't matter if the cylinder change happens to happen at a sample that doesn't have a pressure reading, for example, because we no longer care so deeply about exactly which sample the cylinder change happens at. As a result, the bug Mika noticed just goes away. Reported-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-24Only display temperature graph if we have temperature dataGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Commit b625332ca5ff "Display even constant temperature graph" was a little too aggressive. If we have no temperature data at all it caused us to plot a temperature line for absolute zero... Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-24Display even constant temperature graphGravatar Miika Turkia
Dive profile does not display the temperature graph, if we have a constant temperature (e.g. only one reading at the start of the dive). This patch draws the temperature graph even if max and min temperatures are the same. Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-23Fix temperature rounding issuesGravatar Linus Torvalds
Temperatures can actually be negative, which means that rounding by adding 0.5 and casting to 'int' is not correct. We could use '(int)(rint(val))' instead, but the only place we care about might as well just print out the floating point representation with a precision of two digits instead. So if you have a dive computer that gives you the precision, you might see '3.5˚C' as the temperature. Remove the helper functions that nobody uses and that get the rounding wrong anyway. Reported-by: Henrik Brautaset Aronsen <subsurface@henrik.synth.no> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-23Move more dive computer filled data to the divecomputer structureGravatar Linus Torvalds
This moves the fields 'duration', 'surfacetime', 'maxdepth', 'meandepth', 'airtemp', 'watertemp', 'salinity' and 'surface_pressure' to the per-divecomputer data structure. They are filled in by the dive computer, and normally not edited. NOTE! All actual *use* of this data was then changed from dive->field to dive->dc.field programmatically with a shell-script and sed, and the result then edited for details. So while the XML save and restore code has been updated, all the displaying etc will currently always just show the first dive computer entry. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-15Trivial pressure related fixesGravatar Jan Schubert
This patch removes the need for the "string" pressurebuf in planner.c. It also adds a unit to the partial pressures displayed in the mouse overlay which are always displayed in bar. BTW: Has anyone seen a pO2 shown in PSI? Signed-off-by: Jan Schubert <Jan.Schubert@GMX.li> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-14Centralising and redefining values as integersGravatar Jan Schubert
This patch centralizes the definition for surface pressure, oxygen in air, (re)defines all such values as plain integers and adapts calculations. It eliminates 11 (!) occurrences of definitions for surface pressure and also a few for oxygen in air. It also rewrites the calculation for EAD, END and EADD using the new definitons, harmonizing it for OC and CC and fixes a bug for EADD OC calculation. And finally it removes the unneeded variable entry_ead in gtk-gui.c. Jan Signed-off-by: Jan Schubert <Jan.Schubert@GMX.li> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-14Fix odd calculated deco "ripples"Gravatar Linus Torvalds
Previously we calculate the ceiling at every single second, using the interpolated depth but then only *save* the ceiling at the points where we have a profile event (the whole deco_allowed_depth() function doesn't change any state, so we can just drop it entirely at points that we aren't going to save) Why is it incorrect? I'll try to walk through my understanding of it, by switching things around a bit. - the whole "minimum tissue tolerance" thing could equally well be rewritten to be about "maximum ceiling". And that's easier to think about (since it's what we actually show), so let's do that. - so turning "min_pressure" into "max_ceiling", doing the whole comparison inside the loop means is that we are calculating the maximum ceiling value for the duration of the last sample. And then instead of visualizing the ceiling AT THE TIME OF MAXIMUM CEILING, we visualize that maximal ceiling value AT THE TIME OF THE SAMPLE. End result: we visualize the ceiling at the wrong time. We visualize what was *a* ceiling somewhere in between that sample and the previous one, but we then assign that value to the time of the sample itself. So it ends up having random odd effects. And that also explains why you only see the effect during the ascent. During the descent, the max ceiling will be at the end of our linearization of the sampling, which is - surprise surprise - the position of the sample itself. So we end up seeing the right ceiling at the right time while descending. So the visualization matches the math. But during desaturation, the maximum ceiling is not at the end of the sample period, it's at the beginning. So the whole "max ceiling" thing has basically turned what should be a smooth graph into something that approaches being a step-wise graph at each sample. Ergo: a ripple. And doing the "max_ceiling during the sample interval" thing may sound like the safe thing to do, but the thing is, that really *is* a false sense of safety. The ceiling value is *not* what we compute. The ceiling value is just a visualization of what we computed. Playing games with it can only make the visualization of the real data worse, not better. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-13Add support for MOD, EAD, AND and EADD in the mouse over displayGravatar Dirk Hohndel
- MOD: Maximum Operation Depth based on a configurable limit - EAD: Equivalent Air Depth considering N2 and (!) O2 narcotic - END: Equivalent Nitrogen (Narcotic) Depth considering just N2 narcotic (ignoring O2) - EADD: Equivalent Air Density Depth Please note that some people and even diving organisations have opposite definitions for EAD and END. Considering A stands for Air, lets choose the above. And considering N for Nitrogen it also fits in this scheme. This patch moves N2_IN_AIR from deco.c to dive.h as this is already used in several places and might be useful for future use also. It also respecifies N2_IN_AIR to a more correct value of 78,084%, the former one also included all other gases than oxygen appearing in air. If someone needs to use the former value it would be more correct to use 1-O2_IN_AIR instead. Signed-off-by: Jan Schubert / Jan.Schubert@GMX.li Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-13Scale partial pressure graphs according to enabled gasesGravatar Henrik Brautaset Aronsen
The max Y value of the partial pressure graph grid tends to be way too high when only pO2 or pHe is enabled. Signed-off-by: Henrik Brautaset Aronsen <subsurface@henrik.synth.no> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-10Split up preference data structure definition into 'pref.h'Gravatar Linus Torvalds
.. and rename the badly named 'output_units/input_units' variables. We used to have this confusing thing where we had two different units (input vs output) that *look* like they are mirror images, but in fact "output_units" was the user units, and "input_units" are the XML parsing units. So this renames them to be clearer. "output_units" is now just "units" (it's the units a user would ever see), and "input_units" is now "xml_parsing_units" and set by the XML file parsers to reflect the units of the parsed file. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-09Clean up duplicated depth interpolationGravatar Linus Torvalds
We have several places where we interpolate the depth based on two samples and the time between them. Some of them use floating point, some of them don't, some of them meant to do it but didn't. Just use a common helper function for it. I seriously doubt the floating point here really matters, since doing it in integers is not going to overflow unless we're interpolating between two samples that are hours apart at hundreds of meters of depth, but hey, it gives that rounding to the nearest millimeter. Which I'm sure matters. Anyway, we can probably just get rid of the rounding and the floating point math, but it won't really hurt either, so at least do it consistently. The interpolation could be for other things than just depth, but we probably don't have anything else we'd want to interpolate. But make the function naming generic just in case. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08Minor cleanupsGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Coding style in deco.c. Unneccessary if clause in profile.c (the loop starts with i = 1) Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08Fix deco display bug for dives with multiple samples at the same timeGravatar Dirk Hohndel
While one might argue that multiple samples with the same time are 'odd' that still shouldn't be an excuse to incorrectly reset the ceiling value for them back to 0. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-08Rewrite of the deco codeGravatar Robert C. Helling
o) Instead of using gradient factors as means of comparison, I now use pressure (as in: maximal ambient pressure). o) tissue_tolerance_calc() now computes the maximal ambient pressure now respecting gradient factors. For this, it needs to know about the surface pressure (as refernce for GF_high), thus gets *dive as an argument. It is called from add_segment() which this also needs *dive as an additional argument. o) This implies deco_allowed_depth is now mainly a ambient-pressure to depth conversion with decorations to avoid negative depth (i.e. no deco obliation), implementation of quantization (!smooth => multiples of 3m) and explicit setting of last deco depth (e.g. 6m for O2 deco). o) gf_low_pressure_this_dive (slight change of name), the max depth in pressure units is updated in add_segment. I set the minimal value in buehlmann_config to the equivalent of 20m as otherwise good values of GF_low add a lot of deco to shallow dives which do not need deep stops in the first place. o) The bogus loop is gone as well as actual_gradient_limit() and gradient_factor_calculation() and large parts of deco_allowed_depth() although I did not delete the code but put it in comments. o) The meat is in the formula in lines 147-154 of deco.c. Here is the rationale: Without gradient factors, the M-value (i.e the maximal tissue pressure) at a given depth is given by ambient_pressure / buehlmann_b + a. According to "Clearing Up The Confusion About "Deep Stops" by Erik C. Baker (as found via google) the effect of the gradient factors is no replace this by a reduced affine relation (i.e. another line) such that at the surface the difference between M-value and ambient pressure is reduced by a factor GF_high and at the maximal depth by a factor GF_low. That is, we are looking for parameters alpha and beta such that alpha surface + beta = surface + gf_high * (surface/b + a - surface) and alpha max_p + beta = max_p + gf_low * (max_p/b + a - max_p) This can be solved for alpha and beta and then inverted to obtain the max ambient pressure given tissue loadings. The result is the above mentioned formula. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-07Don't walk back in timeGravatar Linus Torvalds
A strange and buggy dive where time goes backwards (right now easy to create with the dive plan editor) can cause us to run out of plot info elements. This prevents that from causing memory corruption by refusing to go back in time. Reported-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-07Do pressure-time integral using integer valuesGravatar Linus Torvalds
Now that the pressure_time calculations are done in our "native" integer units (millibar and seconds), we might as well keep using integer variables. We still do floating point calculations at various stages for the conversions (including turning a depth in mm into a pressure in mbar), so it's not like this avoids floating point per se. And the final approximation is still done as a fraction of the pressure-time values, using floating point. So floating point is very much involved, but it's used for conversions, not (for example) to sum up lots of small values. With floating point, I had to think about the dynamic range in order to convince myself that summing up small values will not subtly lose precision. With integers, those kinds of issues do not exist. The "lost precision" case is not subtle, it would be a very obvious overflow, and it's easy to think about. It turns out that for the pressure-time integral to overflow in "just" 31 bits, we'd have to have pressures and times that aren't even close to the range of scuba cylinder air use (eg "spend more than a day at a depth of 200+ m"). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-07Don't bother with "correct" units for the pressure_time calculationGravatar Linus Torvalds
I fixed the pressure-time calculations to use "proper" units, but thinking about it some more, it turns out that units don't really matter. As long as we use the *same* unit for calculating the integral, and then re-calculating the step-wise entries, the units will cancel out. So we can simplify the "pressure_time()" function a bit, and use whatever units are most natural for our internal representation. So instead of using atm, use "mbar". Now, since the units don't matter, this patch doesn't really make much of a difference conceptually. Sure, it's a slightly simpler function, but maybe using more "natural" units for it would be worth it. But it turns out that using milli-bar and seconds has an advantage: we could do all the pressure_time integral using 32-bit integers, and we'd still be able to represent values that would be equivalent to staying at 24 bar for a whole day. This patch doesn't actually change the code to use integers, but with this unit choice, we at least have that possibility. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-06Split up helper functions for interpolating gas pressureGravatar Linus Torvalds
This splits up the function to create the estimated pressures for missing tank pressure information. The code now has a separate pass to create the beginning and ending pressures for segments that lack them, and fill them in to match the overall SAC-rate for that cylinder. In the process, it also fixes the calculation of the interpolated gas pressure: you can see this in test-dive 13, where we switch back to the first tank at the end of the dive. It used to be that the latter segment of that cylinder showed in a different color from the first segment, showing that we had a different SAC-rate. But that makes no sense, since our interpolation is supposed to use a constant SAC-rate for each cylinder. The bug was that the "magic" calculation (which is just the pressure change rate over pressure-time) was incorrect, and used the current cylinder pressure for start-pressure calculation. But that's wrong, since we update the current cylinder pressure as we go along, but we didn't update the total pressure_time. With the separate phase to calculate the segment beginning/ending pressures, the code got simplified and the bug stood out more. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-06Fix pressure_time calculation for SAC-rateGravatar Linus Torvalds
The code was using bar, not atm to calculate the pressure_time multiplier. But SAC-rate is relative to atm. We could do the correction at the end (and keep the pressure_time in "bar-seconds"), but let's just use the expected units during the integration. Especially since this also makes a helper function to do the calculations (with variables to keep the units obvious) instead of having multi-line expressions that have the wrong units. This fixes what I thought were rounding errors for the pressure graphs. They were just unit confusion. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-06Split up and re-organize the plot entry calculationsGravatar Linus Torvalds
This splits up the (very complex) function that calculates all the plot info data, so that the gas pressure logic is in several helper functions, and the deco and partial pressure calculations are in a function of their own. That makes the code almost readable. This also changes the cylinder pressure calculations so that if you have manually set the beginning and end pressures, those are the ones we will show (by making them fake "sensor pressures"). We used to shopw some random pressure that was related to the manually entered ones only distantly (through various rounding phases and the SAC-rate calculations). That does make the rounding errors more obvious in the graph, but we can fix that separately. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-06Do a better job at creating plot info entriesGravatar Linus Torvalds
This simplifies - and improves - the code to generate the plot info entries from the samples. We used to generate exactly one plot info entry per sample, and then - because the result doesn't have high enough granularity - we'd generate additional plot info entries at gas change events etc. Which resulted in all kinds of ugly special case logic. Not only for the gas switch, btw: you can see the effects of this in the deco graph (done at plot entry boundaries) and in the gas pressure curves. So this throws that "do special plot entries for gas switch events" code away entirely, and replaces it with a much more straightforward model: we generate plot entries at a minimum of ten-second intervals. If you have samples more often than that, you'll get more frequent plot entries, but you'll never get less than that "every ten seconds". As a result, the code is smaller and simpler (99 insertions, 161 deletions), and actually does a better job too. You can see the difference especially in the test dives that only have a few entries (or if you create a new dive without a dive computer, using the "Add Dive" menu entry). Look at the deco graph of test-dive 20 before and after, for example. You can also see it very subtly in the cylinder pressure curves going from line segments to curves on that same dive. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-05Fix profile display for dives with no samplesGravatar Linus Torvalds
For dives with no samples, we crate a fake dive computer with a set of made-up samples and use those to display the profile. However, the actual calculations to do the maximum duration and depth etc were always done with the "real" dive information, which is empty. As a result, the scale of the plot ended up being bogus, and part of the dive would be missing. Trivially fix by just passing the same dive computer information to calculate_max_limits() that we use for everything else. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-04First stab at simplistic dive planningGravatar Dirk Hohndel
This comes with absolutely no gui - so the plan literally needs to be compiled into Subsurface. Not exactly a feature, but this allowed me to focus on the planning part instead of spending time on tedious UI work. A new menu "Planner" with entry "Test Planner" calls into the hard-coded function in planner.c. There a simple dive plan can be constructed with calls to plan_add_segment(&diveplan, duration, depth at the end, fO2, pO2) Calling plan(&diveplan) does the deco calculations and creates deco stops that keep us below the ceiling (with the GFlow/high values currently configured). The stop levels used are defined at the top of planner.c in the stoplevels array - there is no need to do the traditional multiples of 3m or anything like that. The dive including the ascents and deco stops all the way to the surface is completed and then added as simulated dive to the end of the divelist (I guess we could automatically select it later) and can be viewed. This is crude but shows the direction we can go with this. Envision a nice UI that allows you to simply enter the segments and pick the desired stops. What is missing is the ability to give the algorithm additional gases that it can use during the deco phase - right now it simply keeps using the last gas used in the diveplan. All that said, there are clear bugs here - and sadly they seem to be in the deco calculations, as with the example given the ceiling that is calculated makes no sense. When displayed in smooth mode it has very strange jumps up and down that I wouldn't expect. For example with GF 35/75 (the default) the deco ceiling when looking at the simulated dive jumps from 16m back up to 13m around 14:10 into the dive. That seems very odd. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-04Clean up DEBUG codeGravatar Dirk Hohndel
It's still a mess (and the symbols aren't used consistently), but it's a tiny bit more logical... Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-04Make sure that the calculated deco ends at 0Gravatar Dirk Hohndel
Without this the cairo_close_path call could do silly looking things (intersecting polygons...). Reported-by: "Robert C. Helling" <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-04Fix deco calculations to correctly use GF values and add CC supportGravatar Dirk Hohndel
The old implementation was broken in several ways. For one thing the GF values are percentages, so they should normally be 0 < GF < 1 (well, some crazy people like to go above that). With this most of the Bühlmann config constants were wrong. Furthermore, after we adjust the pressure tolerance based on the gradient factors, we need to convert this back into a depth (instead of passing back the unmodified depth - oops). Finally, this commit adds closed circuit support to the deco calculations. Major progress and much more useful at this stage. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-03Consider previous dives when calculating decoGravatar Dirk Hohndel
This also initializes the N2 tissue saturations to correct numbers (setting them to zero was clearly silly). With this commit we walk back in the dive_table until we find a surface intervall that's longer than 48h. Or a dive that comes after the last one we looked at; that would indicate that this is a divelist that contains dives from multiple divers or dives that for other reasons are not ordered. In a sane environment one would assume that the dives that need to be taken into account when doing deco calculations are organized as one trip in the XML file and so this logic should work. One major downside of the current implementation is that we recalculate everything whenever the plot_info is recreated - which happens quite frequently, for example when resizing the window or even when we go into loup mode. While this isn't all that compute intensive, this is an utter waste and we should at least cache the saturation inherited from previous dives (and clear that number when the selected dive changes). We don't want to cache all of it as the recreation of the plot_info may be triggered by the user changing equipment (and most importantly, gasmix) information. In that case the deco data for this dive does indeed have to be recreated. But without changing the current dive the saturation after the last surface intervall should stay the same. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-03Use gradient factors in deco calculationGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Usually dive computers show the ceiling in terms of the next deco stop - and those are in 3m increments. This commit also adds the ability to chose either the typical 3m increments or the smooth ceiling that the Bühlmann algorithm actually calculates. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-03Add configurable visualization of calculated ceilingGravatar Dirk Hohndel
This is on top of the deco information reported by the dive computer (in a different color - currently ugly green). The user needs to enable this via the Tec page of the preferences. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-03First stab at deco calculationsGravatar Dirk Hohndel
This seems to give us roughly the right data but needs a lot more testing. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2013-01-01Use the Left and Right keys to switch between divecomputersGravatar Dirk Hohndel
The existing code had the somewhat retarded Ctrl-C binding for displaying the next divecomputer and no way to go back to the previous one. With this commit we use our keyboard grab to map Left and Right to previous and next divecomputer. Much nicer. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-30First step in cleaning up cylinder pressure sensor logicGravatar Linus Torvalds
This clarifies/changes the meaning of our "cylinderindex" entry in our samples. It has been rather confused, because different dive computers have done things differently, and the naming really hasn't helped. There are two totally different - and independent - cylinder "indexes": - the pressure sensor index, which indicates which cylinder the sensor data is from. - the "active cylinder" index, which indicates which cylinder we actually breathe from. These two values really are totally independent, and have nothing what-so-ever to do with each other. The sensor index may well be fixed: many dive computers only support a single pressure sensor (whether wireless or wired), and the sensor index is thus always zero. Other dive computers may support multiple pressure sensors, and the gas switch event may - or may not - indicate that the sensor changed too. A dive computer might give the sensor data for *all* cylinders it can read, regardless of which one is the one we're actively breathing. In fact, some dive computers might give sensor data for not just *your* cylinder, but your buddies. This patch renames "cylinderindex" in the samples as "sensor", making it quite clear that it's about which sensor index the pressure data in the sample is about. The way we figure out which is the currently active gas is with an explicit has change event. If a computer (like the Uemis Zurich) joins the two concepts together, then a sensor change should also create a gas switch event. This patch also changes the Uemis importer to do that. Finally, it should be noted that the plot info works totally separately from the sample data, and is about what we actually *display*, not about the sample pressures etc. In the plot info, the "cylinderindex" does in fact mean the currently active cylinder, and while it is initially set to match the sensor information from the samples, we then walk the gas change events and fix it up - and if the active cylinder differs from the sensor cylinder, we clear the sensor data. [Dirk Hohndel: this conflicted with some of my recent changes - I think I merged things correctly...] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-30Update deco handlingGravatar Dirk Hohndel
This commit makes deco handling in Subsurface more compatible with the way libdivecomputer creates the data. Previously we assumed that having a stopdepth or stoptime and no ndl meant that we were in deco. But libdivecomputer supports many dive computers that provide the deco state of the diver but with no information about the next stop or the time needed there. In order to be able to model this in Subsurface this adds an in_deco flag to the samples. This is only stored to the XML file when it changes so it doesn't add much overhead but will allow us to display some deco information on dive computers like the Atomic Aquatics Cobalt or many of the Suuntos (among others). The commit also removes the old event based deco code that was commented out already. And fixes the code so that the deco / ndl information is stored for the very last sample as well. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-29Make the tooltip text for gaschange events more informativeGravatar Dirk Hohndel
We now print out "air", "nn% O2", or "(nn/xx)" for trimix. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-26Add settings section to XML file format and store dive computer IDsGravatar Dirk Hohndel
We only store the model/deviceid/nickname for those dive computers that are mentioned in the XML file. This should make the XML files nicely selfcontained. This also changes the code to consistently use model & deviceid to identify a dive computer. The deviceid is NOT guaranteed to be collision free between different libdivecomputer backends... Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-21Remove nickname from divecomputer data structureGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Having it there with the model information seemed to make sense but on second thought it's the wrong spot to keep that information, especially since we were storing it in the XML file in every single dive. This change removes the nickname member from the divecomputer and makes the rest of the code reasonably self consistent. It does not add much of the new code for the new design to handle nicknames. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-17Add a "View next dive computer" menu itemGravatar Linus Torvalds
This adds the capability to actually view all your dive computers, by adding a menu item under "Log"->"View"->"Next DC" to show the next dive computer. Realistically, if you actually commonly use this, you'd use the accelerator shortcut. Which right now is Ctrl-C ("C for Computer"), which is probably a horrible choice. I really would want to have nice "next/prev dive" accelerators too, because the cursor keys don't work very well with the gtk focus issues. Being able to switch between dives would also make the "just the dive profile, maam" view (ctrl-2) much more useful. The prev/next dive in the profile view should probably be done with a keyboard action callback, which also avoids some of the limitations of accelerators (ie you can make any key do the action). Some gtk person, please? Anyway, this commit only does the dive computer choice thing, and only using the accelerators. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-16Improve visual appearance of horizontal marker linesGravatar Dirk Hohndel
This changes two things to improve the appearance of the profile: - the partial pressure scale is now in 0.5 increments if the total is <= 4 and in 1.0 increments if it is > 4. - the depth marker lines end slightly below the depth chart so that we no longer have overlap between the depth scale and the partial pressure scale. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-16Attempt to free plot data entries in each call to create_plot_info()Gravatar Lubomir I. Ivanov
In profile.c:create_plot_info(), store the last address in which memory was allocated for the plot data entries in the static variable "last_pi_entry". If "last_pi_entry" isn't a NULL pointer in each call to create_plot_info(), free memory at that address. Signed-off-by: Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-13Add the ability to set a nickname for a dive computerGravatar Dirk Hohndel
We maintain a list of dive computers that we know about (by deviceid) and their nicknames in our config. If the user downloads dive from a dive computer that we haven't seen before, we give them the option to set a nickname for that dive computer. That nickname is displayed in the profile (and stored in the XML file, assuming it is not the same as the model). This implementation attempts to make sure that it correctly deals with utf8 nicknames. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-11Only display a depth scale appropriate for the depth of the diveGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Showing the depth scale all the way to the bottom of the profile plot looks strange when there are partial pressure graphs down there. So instead we only plot down to the next marker below the maximum depth of the actual dive. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-11Show CNS value in the profile mouseoverGravatar Dirk Hohndel
If we have per-sample CNS values, then show them in the profile tooltip. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-11Merge branch 'cns' into cns-mergeGravatar Dirk Hohndel
I foolishly changed visible_columns in both the (ill-named) cns branch and master... Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org> Conflicts: divelist.c gtk-gui.c profile.c
2012-12-11Calculate dive maxima/minima independent of dive computerGravatar Linus Torvalds
This splits the dive time, depth, pressure and temperature maxima and minima setup from the per-dive-computer "create_plot_info()" function into one setup function that walks _all_ the dive computers, so that we have a global maxima and minima. That way the graph scaling we set up will now fit the data from all dive computers rather than just the particular one we are plotting. So if you switch back-and-forth between computers, the scale (which is defined by the extremes) remains the same. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-10Don't draw tooltips if no profile is displayedGravatar Dirk Hohndel
This fixes ticket 33 Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-10Move global variables covered by Preferences into one structureGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Now we can simply remember the state of all the preferences at the beginning of preferences_dialog() and restore them if the user presses 'Cancel'. Fixes #21 Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-09Don't print partial pressure values in the profileGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Instead provide a scale on the right in a highly transparent grey and rely on the tooltip available with mouse-over to pinpoint the value at certain spots with much better accuracy. Fixes #30 Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2012-12-08Don't print an initial gaschange event that just tells us the gas usedGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Some dive computers appear to tell us the gas used in a gaschange event right at the beginning of the dive. We arbitrary have a cut-off that says "a gas change in the first 30 seconds shouldn't get a marker". Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>