| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
To reset the core data structures, the mobile and desktop UIs
were calling into the dive-list models, which then reset the
core data structures, themselves and the unrelated
locationinformation model. The UI code then reset various other
things, such as the TankInformation model or the map. . This was
unsatisfying from a control-flow perspective, as the models should
display the core data, not act on it. Moreover, this meant lots
of intricate intermodule-dependencies.
Thus, straighten up the control flow: give the C core the
possibility to send a "all data reset" event. And do that
in those functions that reset the core data structures.
Let each module react to this event by itself. This removes
inter-module dependencies. For example, the MainWindow now
doesn't have to reset the TankInfoModel or the MapWidget.
Then, to reset the core data structures, let the UI code
simply directly call the respective core functions.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Grammar-nazi ran
git grep -l 'indexes' | xargs sed -i '' -e 's/indexes/indices/g'
to prevent future wincing when reading the source code.
Unfortunatly, Qt itself is infected as in
QModelIndexList QItemSelection::indexes() const
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
|
|
This part of the code had that horrible pattern, where reseting
the model would invalidate all pointers to the DiveTrip model.
Internalize these complexities in the MultiFilterSortModel.
All accesses are now performed via that proxy model.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The UI talks to the filter model. Therefore route clearing of
data through that model instead of accessing the source model
directly.
This will allow us to remove the DiveTripModel::instance()
function and makes control flow less "jumpy".
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The DiveListView caught signals from the DiveTripModel
with the corresponding indexes. However, the DiveListView
is actually connected to the MultiFilterSortModel and
thus has to translate the indexes.
Instead, catch the signals in the MultiFilterSortModel,
transform them and resend. Let the DiveListView get
its signal from the MultiFilterSortModel.
Yes, this makes things less efficient because there is
an extra signal. On the upside, the makes data-flow much
more logical. Selection will have to be fixed anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The way this was accessed via Qt's model semantics was horrible.
This gives arguably more readable code, since we don't have to
shoehorn things through QVariants.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Split out the actual filtering from the MultiFilterSortModel.
Create a DiveFilter class that does the actual filtering.
Currently, mobile and desktop have their own version of this
class, though ultimately we may want to merge them.
The idea here is that the trip-model and undo-commands have
direct access to the filter-function and thus can take care
of keeping track of the number of shown dives, etc.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The filter-model was catching dives-added / dives-deleted signals
from the models to keep track of the number of shown dives.
To simplify the data flow, do this directly in the undo-command.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
We mark hidden/shown dives in the core but store the number
of shown dives in the MultiFilterSortModel. Move this datum
to the core for improved locality.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Nobody was calling this function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Nobody was using that function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The dive-site-edit and dive-site-table tabs both put the filter
into a special dive-site mode. When switching between both, it
could happen that the one got its show befor the other got
its hide event.
Thus, the first would start dive-site filtering and the second
stop it. Now the app was not in filter mode even though it should.
To solve this problem, add reference counting for the filter's
dive-site mode. In both tabs call the enter/exit functions
on show/hide. In the dive-site-table tab, when the selection
changes, use a set function that doesn't modify the reference count.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
When dive sites are edited, we shouldn't highlight the sites
of the current dive, but the currently edited site(s).
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
When on the dive site tab or editing a dive site, we want
to show all dive sites so that the user can related different
dive sites. Therefore export a "in dive site mode" flag from
the filter model and don't filter in that case in MapWidgetHelper.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
In the edit-dive-site tab the filter is switched to a particular
mode where only dives at that site are shown.
If we want to reuse this for the dive-site tab the mode has to
be extended to allow for multiple dive sites. This is trivially
done by replacing a pointer by a vector of pointers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Instead of sending a signal when counts change, catching them
in the filter widget and update the window title there,
directly update the window title in the model. This removes a
signal/slot pair.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The filter code is strange: it actually only checks the
dive->hidden_by_filter flag. Thus, before propagating the dive
changed signal, this flag has to be updated. Do this in the
DiveTripModel. Ultimately, this should be refactored.
Moreover, if the filter-flag changed notify the frontend
of a changed trip so that the trip is hidden / unhidden.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
All the field in the Notes Panel of the main window are now supported.
This needs some testing especially for the Notes field that may contain
markup. It appears ok to me for single term searches. One would like
to think about the default search option for the Notes.
There is a vertical spacer in the Filter panel that I moved downwards
and whose function I am not quite sure of.
[Dirk Hohndel: small adjustments]
Signed-off-by: willemferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
Since a dive has only one location all-of makes little sense. It
*can* make sense if the user enters two substrings (e.g. Tofo and Reef),
but generally it won't. Therefore change the default to any-of.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Add an additional mode to the tags, people and location filters: any_of.
Replace the original invert-bool by an enum.
Move the common code into a distinct function.
Reported-by: Willem Ferguson <willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za>
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Add negate buttons to the Tags, People, Location and Equipment
filters. Currently, if nothing is entered the filter is ignored
whether negate is on or off. One might think about filtering all
dives without tags, etc. instead.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Move initialization to a separate function and connect that to the
reset button.
Two points of note:
1) Reseting the text-fields causes signals. Thus, signals have to
be ignored during reset. Do this with a new flag.
2) To make reset of the from-date work, the from-date has to be
initialized to a distinct value. Setting a default-constructed
QDateTime leaves the widget unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Update the filter counts if dives were added removed by the
undo commands. The undo commands call into the filter model
at the right time so that hidden_by_filter is already set.
The filter model keeps track of the counts and emits a signal,
which is caught by the widget.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The temperature range 0-100 was inadequate in both supported
scales (Celsius and Fahrenheit). Extend the range to encompass
all physically meaningful values in both scales.
Use the default-values to set the minimum and maximum of the
UI-fields. Thus, these values are configurable in a single place.
In the future we should use a scale-independent representation
(e.g. mkelvin as in the rest of the code base). But this would
mean implementing a custom widget with a conversion function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
On all (most?) places we use separate date/time fields for the time of a
dive, and we follow the setting from the preferences to format those.
Make the new filter widget consistent, with respect to the to and from
interval.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
|
|
In FilterWidget2::updateFilter() a new FilterData object is generated
and then copied onto the filterData member variable. Instead, modify
filterData directly. This seems also more logical from a semantic
point of view: Do we want to reset fields that were not set by the
user?
Contains trivial whitespace fix.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Add filter for dives having a planned dive computer or
a logged dive computer.
Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de>
|
|
The DiveTripModel was used to represent both, trip and list views.
Thus many functions had conditionals checking for the current mode
and both modes had to be represented by the same data structure.
Instead, split the model in two and derive them from a base class,
which implements common functions and defines an interface.
The model can be switched by a call to resetModel(), which invalidates
any pointer obtained by instance(). This is quite surprising
behavior. To handle it, straighten out the control flow:
DiveListView --> MultiFilterSortModel --> DiveTripModelBase
Before, DiveListView accessed DiveTripModelBase directly.
A goal of this commit is to enable usage of the same model by mobile
and desktop.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The source-model was cached in MultiFilterSortModel. For simplicity,
remove that and simply access via DiveTripModel::instance(). There
is only one instance where the cached model was used: when comparing
items for sorting. Thus, in indirection is added in a "hot" path.
Nevertheless, this will dwarf against the cost of string comparison.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Drop tons of now-unused-code.
Signed-off-by: Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabrava@kde.org>
|
|
The idea is that this struct will have all the needed data
that will be passed to the filter model. Everything that happens
on the filterwidget will fill out this struct, then forward it
to the model, that in turn will activate the filter hiding
some of the dives that matches on your divelist.
Signed-off-by: Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabrava@kde.org>
|
|
The dive list was sorted using the default-sorter of
QSortFilterProxy model. This is mighty inflexible as it
considers only one column. This has the funky effect that
for rows with identical elements, the sort order depends
on the previous sorting.
Implement a lessThan() function in the MultiFilterSortModel,
which simply hands the sorting down to the actual model.
This might be considered a layering violation, but it makes
things so much easier.
Sadly, it seems like the column-to-be-sorted is transported
in the provided indices. Therefore, the comparison is chosen
using a switch for *every* comparison. It would seem much
more logical to set a function pointer once and use that.
Further investigations are necessary.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The data-flow from C-core to list-view is as follows:
C-core --> DiveTripModel --> MultiSortFilterModel --> DiveListView
The control-flow, on the other hand, differs as DiveListView
accesses both MultiSortFilterModel and DiveTripModel, whereas
MultiSortFilterModel is mostly unaware of its source model.
This is in principle legitimate, as the MultiSortFilterModel might
be used for different sources. In our particular case, this is
not so. MultiSortFilterModel is written for a particular use case.
Therefore, model control-flow follow after data-flow: Let MultiSortFilterModel
set its own source model and DiveListView access the MultiSortFilterModel,
which then manages its source model.
This is not bike-shedding, but will enable a more flexible and
higher-performance sorting.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
This is another case of a weird pattern where an object would
connect it's own signal to the slot of a different object.
There seems to be no reason why the former couldn't simply
call the latter.
Remove the [start|stop]FilterDiveSite signals of LocationInformationWidget
and call the corresponding functions of MultiFilterSortModel directly.
While doing so, replace the UUID argument by a pointer-to-divesite.
It will be converted anyway right at the beginning of the function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Currently, the filter is recalculated if a filter-entry is changed.
This also happens if the counts of a filter-entry changes. This
is to be avoided, as it causes unnecessary churn.
Therefore, send the proper role with the dataChanged() signal
and add a new slot, which invalidates only if a field with the
Qt::CheckStateRole is changed.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Instead of reloading all the filter, only increment / decrement the
count of the entries of added / removed dives.
Originally, this was planned to be done via the signals from the
divelist, but it turned out that this was suboptimal, because
if the filter decides that the new item is selected, this has to
be done *before* adding the dive. Otherwise, it wouldn't be shown.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
This reverts commit 1c4a859c8d0b37b2e938209fe9c4d99e9758327a,
where the override modifiers were removed owing to the noisy
"inconsistent override modifiers" which is default-on in clang.
This warning was disabled in 77577f717f5aad38ea8c4c41c10c181486c4337f,
so we can reinstate the overrides.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
All callers of FilterModelBase::updateList() sorted the items
(except the last one). Thus we can do the sorting inside the
function.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Since FilterModelBase now contains complex data (counts and checked),
we might just as well make it a full model and keep track of
the name as well. I.e. do not derive from QStringListModel but from
QAbstractListModel and add the name to the item structure.
Implement proper reset / add / rename semantics. This is overkill at the
moment, as after all any modification the model will be reset, but
ultimately it will allow us to be smarter and only update rows when
needed.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Currently, in FilterModelBase::data() the number of dives is recalculated.
This happens for every mouse-over event!
Calculate the number of dives only on recalculation and store the count
in the items-struct.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
In the future, we might be smarter about the dive-counts and calculate
them only once and incrementally (if e.g. new dives are added).
Prepare for more complex caching by turning the checked boolean into
a struct, which can then be extended by a count and other things
(e.g. the name).
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The filter code was an unholy intermixture of backend and frontend
logic, which made it hard to access it from outside of the UI.
Notably, it expected that Qt would call filterAcceptsRow on all rows.
For trip-view, apparently the filter functions were called twice
(once for filtering the trip, then for filtering the individual dives).
Make the filtering explicit, by calling showDive() for all dives in
MultiFilterSortModel::myInvalidate(), setting the hidden_by_filter
flags accordingly and ultimately invalidating the filter.
The UI code only accesses the hidden_by_filter flag set previously.
The "justCleared" flag can then be removed, since accessing the filter
does not have side effects. Moreover, there is no noticeable performance
gain by returning out early.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
To make dive-filtering accessible from other parts of the code,
break out the actual dive-filtering code into a function that
takes a pointer-to-dive instead of QModelIndex.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Conceptually, the doFilter() functions shouldn't modify the dive
they test. Therefore, make the argument const. To do this, constify
the parameter of get_dive_location(), which likewise seems to be
the right thing to do.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Change the signature from of the virtual doFilter() functions from
bool doFilter(struct dive *d, QModelIndex&, QAbstractItemModel*) const;
to
bool LocationFilterModel::doFilter(struct dive *d) const;
as the QModelIndex and QAbstractItemModel parameters were not used.
This makes this functions independent from Qt's model/view
framework. This is in preparation for making the undo-machinery
compatible with the filtering.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Commit df156a56c08a56eb380711a507ef739d8150a71f replaced "virtual"
by "override" where appropriate. Unfortunately, this had the
unintended consequence of producing numerous clang warnings. If
clang finds a override-modified function in a class definition,
it warns for *all* overriden virtual functions without the override
modifier.
To solve this, go the easy route and remove all overrides. At least
it is consistent.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The keyword "virtual" signalizes that the function is virtual,
i.e. the function of the derived class is called, even if the
call is on the parent class.
It is not necessary to repeat the "virtual" keyword in derived
classes. To highlight derived virtual functions, the keyword
"override" should be used instead. It results in a hard compile-
error, if no function is overridden, thus avoiding subtle bugs.
Replace "virtual" by "override" where appropriate. Moreover,
replace Q_DECL_OVERRIDE by override, since we require reasonably
recent compilers anyway. Likewise, replace /* reimp */ by
"override" for consistency and compiler support.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
Introduce toggle buttons which mean "filter all dives except
those fulfilling the selected criteria".
The old code used to check for rowCount() == 0. This should never happen,
because there is always a row "empty field". This check was moved into
the preamble of the functions to seperate it from the actual logic.
Fixes #435
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
To every filter list add a menu button that allows selection of all,
selection of none or inversion of selection.
Implements #435.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
|
The *FilterModels had a number of of virtual functions, which only
accessed members of the base class. Moreover, these functions were
identical and generated with macros. Therefore, move these functions
to the base class.
The one excption is data(), which uses different count functions
(passed as a macro parameter). Thus, introduce a virtual countDives()
function and likewise move data() to the base class. A function pointer
might be even more clear, but since the rest of the code/Qt relies
heavily on runtime polymorphism, let's do the same here.
The only macros left are those creating the singleton accessors.
This could be more clearly realized by templates, but let's
likewise keep it the way is.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
|
Berthold Stoeger
Robert C. Helling
Willem Ferguson
Jan Mulder
Tomaz Canabrava