Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
While the project doesn't use Travis anymore, these scripts are indeed
useful when building locally, so it makes sense to keep them current and
working.
Signed-off-by: Christof Arnosti <charno@charno.ch>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
With all upgrading, the build apks now show up in a slightly different
location. Correct this in the scripting. Notice that this is debug
building only. Release building is outside the repo.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
|
|
Local testing seems to indicate that the build should work with this container.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
With this we have working arm and arm64 images (except that the arm64
image crashes when using Bluetooth).
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
Again, this is relevant for developers that do local docker android
builds, and normal android builds. A normal build uses the directory
subsurface-mobile-build-arm(64), and when doing a docker android build
this directory is shared between host and container. That sharing is
good, as it nicely exposes the build tree to the host (for easy compare,
inspection, etc.). But reusing the same tree as the local one is
inconvenient (and possibly dangerous due to all kinds of caching
issues).
So, give the docker build its own output tree for the shared
subsurface-mobile-build-arm(64) build output.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
|
|
Users that use docker locally for Windows style build and Android style
builds will (probably) not like that we use the same name for both
docker containers. So, give the android builder its own name.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
This should make it easier to make changes to our build environment.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
But simply ignore when building outside of Travis.
Of course since we are building Android in a container, we need to first pass
the environment variable to the container...
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
This way we ensure we can build on the latest LTS, and not just a old
lts.
Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin <glance@acc.umu.se>
|
|
Since about a year ago qt-android-cmake shifted to using gradle instead
of ant, and the android sdk's stopped supporting ant to.
Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin <glance@acc.umu.se>
|
|
The build fails with newer versions and Ubuntu:latest switched to bionic
a few weeks ago.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
And use the 'correct' URL to obtain the actual file.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
In some situations Travis CI doesn't seem to notice that a build failed and
give us a green check mark even though the build didn't succeed.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
In commit e643589233 ("Travis: setup up the desired release message
right away") we temproarily switched to my fork of uploadtool to take
advantage of a new feature that I had implemented there. This has
already been merged upstream, so let's switch back to upstream.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
Instead of using the default release message and then trying to fix it up
in the after_success section of one of the builds that we test, let's just
always use the message that we want, regardless which build finishes first.
This currently requires my fork of the uploadtool - the changes have been
submitted upstream and I hope they'll get merged there so we can switch
back to the upstream version of uploadtool.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
|
|
This adds a android-apk-build which runs on travis-ci. This is using a
quite ugly trick, building in a docker container, basically just to get
a newer cmake. The cmake in trusty is way to old to work with android
builds.
A good side-effect is that this is a complete copy-paste for anyone who
would like to build android-binaries them self on Linux. All the
uglyness is hidden away in a docker container.
Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin <glance@acc.umu.se>
|