summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/subsurface-core/dive.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-04-04Move subsurface-core to core and qt-mobile to mobile-widgetsGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Having subsurface-core as a directory name really messes with autocomplete and is obviously redundant. Simmilarly, qt-mobile caused an autocomplete conflict and also was inconsistent with the desktop-widget name for the directory containing the "other" UI. And while cleaning up the resulting change in the path name for include files, I decided to clean up those even more to make them consistent overall. This could have been handled in more commits, but since this requires a make clean before the build, it seemed more sensible to do it all in one. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-04-04Don't write back dive data that hasn't changed in gitGravatar Linus Torvalds
This caches the git ID for the dive on load, and avoids building the dive directory and hashing it on save as long as nothing has invalidated the git ID cache. That should make it much faster to write back data to the git repository, since the dive tree structure and the divecomputer blobs in particular are the bulk of it (due to all the sample data). It's not actually the git operations that are all that expensive, it's literally generating the big blob with all the snprintf() calls for the data. The git save used to be a fairly expensive with large data sets, especially noticeable on mobile with much weaker CPU's. This should speed things up by at least a factor of two. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-04-01Fix cylinder end pressure fixup from samplesGravatar Linus Torvalds
This bug admittedly hits almost nobody, but if you had multiple cylinder pressure sensors on the same cylinder (attached to multiple dive computers, of course), we would take the beginning pressure from the first dive computer, and the ending pressure from the last dive computer. That came about because we'd just walk all the dive computer samples in order, and the first time we see a relevant sample and we don't have a beginning pressure, we'd take that pressure. So the beginning pressure was from the first dive computer, and once we'd seen a valid beginning pressure, that would never change. But as we're walking along, we'd continue to update the ending pressure from the last relevant sample we see, which means that as we go on to look at the other dive computers, we'd continue to update the ending pressure with data from them. And mixing beginning/ending pressures from two different sensors just does not make sense. This changes the logic to be the same for beginning and ending pressures: we only update it once, with the first relevant sample we see. But we walk the samples twice: forwards from the beginning to find the first beginning pressure, and backwards from the end to find the ending pressure. That means that as we move on to the second dive computer, we've now filled in the ending pressure from the first one, and will no longer update it any more. NOTE! We don't stop scanning the samples (or the dive computers) just because we've found a valid pressure value. We'll always walk all the samples because there might be multiple different cylinders that get pressure data from different samples (and different dive computers). We could have some early-out logic when we've filled in all relevant cylinders, but since this just runs once per dive it's not worth it. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-04-01Split up fixup_dive_dc() into multiple smaller independent functionsGravatar Linus Torvalds
fixup_dive_dc() is called for each dive computer when we add a new dive. It does various housekeeping functions, cleaning up the sample data, and fixing up dive details as a result of the sample data. The function has grown to be a monster over time, and particularly the central "walk every sample" loop has become an unreadable mess. And the thing is, this isn't even all that performance-critical: it's only done once per dive and dc, and there is no reason to have a single illegible and complex loop. So split up that loop into several smaller pieces that each will loop individually over the sample data, and do just one thing. So now we have separate functions for - fixing up the depth samples with interpolation - fixing up dive temperature data - correcting the cylinder pressure sensor index - cleaning up the actual sample pressures Yes, this way we walk the samples multiple times, but the end result is that the code is much easier to understand. There should be no actual behavioral differences from this cleanup, except for the fact that since the code is much more understandable, this cleanup also fixed a bug: In the temperature fixup, we would fix up the overall dive temperatures based on the dive computer temperatures. But we would then fix up the overall dive computer temperature based on the sample temperature *afterwards*, which wouldn't then be reflected in the overall dive temperatures. There was another non-symptomatic bug that became obvious when doing this cleanup: the code used to calculate a 'depthtime' over the dive that was never actually used. That's a historical artifact of old code that had become dead when the average depth calculations were moved to a function of their own earlier. This is preparatory for fixing the overall cylinder pressure stats, which are currently wrong for dives with multiple dive computers: we currently take the starting cylinder pressure from the *first* dive computer that has cylinder pressure information, but we take the ending cylinder pressure from the *last* dive computer with cylinder pressure information. This does not fix that bug, but without this cleanup fixing that would be a nightmare due to the previous complicated "do everything in one single loop" model. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-03-30Be smarter about dive renumbering when merging divesGravatar Linus Torvalds
We really have two different cases for merging dives: (a) downloading a new dive from a dive computer, and merging it with an existing dive that we had already created using a different dive computer. This is the "try_to_merge()" case, called from "process_dives() (b) merging two different dives into one longer dive. This is the "merge_two_dives()" case when you explicitly merge dives using the divelist. While a lot of the issues are the same, many details differ, and one of the details is how dive numbering should be handled. In particular, when you download from a dive computer and merge with an existing dive, you want too take the *maximum* dive number, because the dive computer notion of which dive it is may well not match what the user dive number is. On the other hand, when you explicitly merge in the dive list, you end up renumbering not just the dive you are merging, but also all subsequent dives, since you now have one fewer dives overall. So that case already has to be handled by the caller. Now, the simpler "download from dive computer" case was broken by commit ce3a78efcac2 ("Assign lower number to a merged dive instead of higher one"). It fixed the numbering for the divelist case, but broke the download case. So this commit reverts commit ce3a78efcac2, and instead extends and clarifies the dive renumbering that "merge_two_dives()" already did. It now explicitly renumbers not just the following dives, but also renumbers the merged dive itself, so now we can go back to the old "take the bigger dive number" for the core merging, which fixes the download case. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-03-23Don't try to force depth to be unsignedGravatar Dirk Hohndel
Trying to clean up the signed vs. unsigned issues it becomes clear that forcing depth to be unsigned causes way too many problems in the code. So this commit goes the opposite direction; since we clearly aren't limited INT_MAX vs UINT_MAX, simply make more of the depth related variables signed. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-03-16When handing off a picture to a worker thread, copy it firstGravatar Robert C. Helling
as otherwise we crash when the picture is freed before the worker thread (to load from the net or to compute hashes) is finished Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-03-09Clean up signedness confusion in dive.cGravatar Dirk Hohndel
This started out as cleaning up warnings - but it actually turned into a matter of semantics and correctness. Which lead to changes in .h files which will have a ton of ripple effects. A lot more of this to come. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-03-02gas model: split up gas compressibility into a file of its ownGravatar Linus Torvalds
The gas compressibility is such a specialized thing that I really prefer having it separate. This keeps Robert's Redlich-Kwong equation as-is, but let's experiment with other models soon... Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-02-29This computes the compressibility of the gas depending on the mixture.Gravatar Robert C. Helling
As it turns out, the van der Waals equation gives results that are numerically not really useful, so we use the Redlich Kwong equation which is, according to Wikipedia, much more accurate, which can be confirmed given the empirical values for air. As opposed to the previous approach with a look-up table, this takes into account the actual gasmix. This always assumes the gas to be at 20 degrees Centigrade. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-02-28If salinity is not density, add density of fresh waterGravatar Robert C. Helling
There was a reported case of an import of a dive that gave a salinity of 35g/l. This is an actual salinity (an amount of salt in the water) but for subsurface the salinity is actually the density of the water. So for too small values of the salinity add the density of fresh water. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-02-25gas pressures: use an actual compressibility table for airGravatar Linus Torvalds
We could in theory make this dependent on the gasmix, but for now let's just assume (incorrectly) that everything we breathe acts like air. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-02-25gas pressures: do not use gas compressibility for cylinder namingGravatar Linus Torvalds
This actually didn't make a difference for the common case, since our simplified gas compressibility model had a compressibility factor of 1.0 up to 200 bar, and increased smoothly from there. As a result, the common 2400 and 3000 psi workpressures didn't really see an effect from this. Not taking compressibility into account does kind of make sense for cylinder naming, since the cylinder may be used for different gases with very different compressibility characteristics. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-02-25gas pressures: do some initial cleanupGravatar Linus Torvalds
This marks "surface_volume_multiplier()" static in preparation for changing it to use an actual honest-to-goodness compressibility estimation. Without that, it wasn't obvious that the function wasn't used in other random places. Also, remove the "wet_volume()" function. It was unused, but more importantly, it was wrong. Yes, it was the inverse of "gas_volume()", but when you calculate wet volumes from the imperial sizes, you don't actually use the "real" gas volume, you use the idealized one. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-02-20Add option to allocate the samples in fake_dc()Gravatar Dirk Hohndel
We (ab)use fake_dc() to create a pleasing profile for a manually added dive. Based on it's intended use, fake_dc() simply handed back a dc structure that pointed at staticly allocated samples - that's obviously (now that I think about it) going to blow up in my face if I edit a manually added dive more than once. So now we have an option for fake_dc() to actually allocate the samples - this way the rest of the code can treat these samples as we would treat samples created any other way. We can free them and replace them with a new set. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-02-04Allow merging of dives with zero depth/durationGravatar Miika Turkia
Fixes #1003 Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2016-01-07Assign lower number to a merged dive instead of higher oneGravatar Salvador Cuñat
At the moment, if we have, say, dives ... 100, 101 and 102 and we merge 101 and 102, we get a list numbered ... 99, 100, 102. This is, probably, an undesired behavior. The patch simple chooses lower of both dive numbers instead of higher one. Signed-off-by: Salvador Cuñat <salvador.cunat@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-12-27dive: paren error in set point handlingGravatar Stephen Hemminger
This probably is a serious bug, found by cppcheck. Original code had paren's in probably the wrong place! Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-12-03Prevent gaschange tank icons from using garbage coords.Gravatar K. \"pestophagous\" Heller
Tank icons were shown at incorrect spots on the profile when the DiveEventItem object held a pointer to a struct event even after the struct event at that address had been freed. When internalEvent is a pointer to freed memory, internalEvent->time.seconds could have all kinds of crazy values, which get used in member function DiveEventItem::recalculatePos to place the tank at bad x coordinates. The DiveEventItem(s) no longer store a pointer to memory that they do not own. This way, no matter how the path of execution arrives into slot recalculatePos, we never need fear that the DiveEventItem will dereference a garbage pointer to a struct event. Fixes #968 Signed-off-by: K. Heller <pestophagous@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-11-16dive.c: fix a couple of comment typosGravatar Lubomir I. Ivanov
Signed-off-by: Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-11-15simple spelling changesGravatar Stephen Hemminger
Fix obvious spelling mistakes in comments (and one error message). Yes, this is trivial but I saw one while reviewing some of the code and after that decided to run code through some tools. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-11-07dive.c: remove unused variableGravatar Lubomir I. Ivanov
Signed-off-by: Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com>
2015-10-30Move all core-functionality to subsurface-coreGravatar Tomaz Canabrava
And adapt a new CMakeLists.txt file for it. On the way I've also found out that we where double-compilling a few files. I've also set the subsurface-core as a include_path but that was just to reduce the noise on this commit, since I plan to remove it from the include path to make it obligatory to specify something like include "subsurface-core/dive.h" for the header files. Since the app is growing quite a bit we ended up having a few different files with almost same name that did similar things, I want to kill that (for instance Dive.h, dive.h, PrintDive.h and such). Signed-off-by: Tomaz Canabrava <tomaz.canabrava@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>