subsurface.git - forked from https://github.com/subsurface/subsurface

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2015-08-31	Adopt expected times in TestPlan	Robert C. Helling
	Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-31	Changed qInfo() to qDebug()	Robert C. Helling
	... as the former was introduced only in Qt 5.5 in order to make the test build also with 5.4 Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-30	TestPlan: Do not re-declare bool result	Rick Walsh
	Fixing this error makes TestPlan pass again. Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-29	VPM-B Tests: Compare against known Subsurface runtime	Rick Walsh
	We should compare the calculated runtime against the runtime previously calculated by Subsurface, expecting them to match exactly, in order to detect if a change has been made. We still compare against a benchmark, allowing some difference. Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-29	Update expected runtime of VPM-B test to match benchmark	Rick Walsh
	Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-29	VPM-B Tests: Output first ceiling	Rick Walsh
	This is useful for determining why we calculate a difference profile Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-25	Dive planner tests: pass dives that are close to expected duration	Rick Walsh
	Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-25	VPM-B: Add more planner tests	Rick Walsh
	Add more VPM-B planner tests. The "expected" total run time is taken as the total run time produced by the Fortran VPM-B program. For all these tests, the results are within two minutes, which is a good result, but most are classified as a "fail". Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-25	Test VPM-B Correct expected dive time in comment	Rick Walsh
	Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-25	Test another VPM-B dive plan	Rick Walsh
	This adds a test for 100 m for 60 min dive on trimix using VPM-B Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-08-23	Add a test for the VPM-B mode of the planner	Robert C. Helling
	Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-07-06	Fix typo in test and some numbers	Robert C. Helling
	With these values I reproduce the runtimes from the UI. Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling <helling@atdotde.de> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-07-05	Adapt the test to the API change	Dirk Hohndel
	Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
2015-07-05	Add simple test for the dive planner	Dirk Hohndel
	This sets up a standard dive scenario (30 minutes at 260ft/79m, EAN36 and Oxygen as deco gases, last stop at 20ft/6m) and calls the planner to set up a dive plan given certain standard gases. Instead of trying to verify the complete plans it checks that we switch to the deco gases at the right depth and the complete duration of the dive matches our expectation. The test intentionally fails right now for imperial as we have the wrong switch depth for Oxygen. See how useful tests are? On the downside, the test does NOT produce the same plan as Subsurface when I try to create a consistent setup for both - and I have not been able to figure out why. There must be some other parameters that I'm not setting, but I haven't identified them, yet. It's very small differences, for example in the metric case the stops at 21m, 9m, and 6m are each one minute shorter in the test than it what Subsurface calculates. Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>