From 936bd52a42194039640720734af99745b9241161 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rick Walsh Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 14:42:54 +1100 Subject: VPM-B: Adjust Subsurface conservatism Reverting commit 3d8e5b638ad4c1fbb43f6dd5f535bf0b33a51f0b makes the CVA calculation marginally less conservative, and one of the tests fails as a result. This tiny adjustment to the conservatism fixes that. Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel --- deco.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'deco.c') diff --git a/deco.c b/deco.c index f9d60326d..86acc0351 100644 --- a/deco.c +++ b/deco.c @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ #define cube(x) (x * x * x) // Subsurface appears to produce marginally less conservative plans than our benchmarks -// Introduce 1% additional conservatism -#define subsurface_conservatism_factor 1.01 +// Introduce 1.2% additional conservatism +#define subsurface_conservatism_factor 1.012 extern bool in_planner(); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2