aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/subsurface-core/sha1.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Tomaz Canabrava <tomaz.canabrava@intel.com>2015-09-02 20:52:34 -0300
committerGravatar Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>2015-10-30 10:36:48 -0700
commit4c0156e3d51b389db8eccc3fa3da4b8f248f9b13 (patch)
tree966868d29150fdba13a5a56fb4305bc432ec7a72 /subsurface-core/sha1.c
parenta0798214231c652ac6142228f5ddfc4b65c921f8 (diff)
downloadsubsurface-4c0156e3d51b389db8eccc3fa3da4b8f248f9b13.tar.gz
Move all core-functionality to subsurface-core
And adapt a new CMakeLists.txt file for it. On the way I've also found out that we where double-compilling a few files. I've also set the subsurface-core as a include_path but that was just to reduce the noise on this commit, since I plan to remove it from the include path to make it obligatory to specify something like include "subsurface-core/dive.h" for the header files. Since the app is growing quite a bit we ended up having a few different files with almost same name that did similar things, I want to kill that (for instance Dive.h, dive.h, PrintDive.h and such). Signed-off-by: Tomaz Canabrava <tomaz.canabrava@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'subsurface-core/sha1.c')
-rw-r--r--subsurface-core/sha1.c300
1 files changed, 300 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/subsurface-core/sha1.c b/subsurface-core/sha1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..acf8c5d9f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/subsurface-core/sha1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+/*
+ * SHA1 routine optimized to do word accesses rather than byte accesses,
+ * and to avoid unnecessary copies into the context array.
+ *
+ * This was initially based on the Mozilla SHA1 implementation, although
+ * none of the original Mozilla code remains.
+ */
+
+/* this is only to get definitions for memcpy(), ntohl() and htonl() */
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#ifdef WIN32
+#include <winsock2.h>
+#else
+#include <arpa/inet.h>
+#endif
+#include "sha1.h"
+
+#if defined(__GNUC__) && (defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__))
+
+/*
+ * Force usage of rol or ror by selecting the one with the smaller constant.
+ * It _can_ generate slightly smaller code (a constant of 1 is special), but
+ * perhaps more importantly it's possibly faster on any uarch that does a
+ * rotate with a loop.
+ */
+
+#define SHA_ASM(op, x, n) ({ unsigned int __res; __asm__(op " %1,%0":"=r" (__res):"i" (n), "0" (x)); __res; })
+#define SHA_ROL(x, n) SHA_ASM("rol", x, n)
+#define SHA_ROR(x, n) SHA_ASM("ror", x, n)
+
+#else
+
+#define SHA_ROT(X, l, r) (((X) << (l)) | ((X) >> (r)))
+#define SHA_ROL(X, n) SHA_ROT(X, n, 32 - (n))
+#define SHA_ROR(X, n) SHA_ROT(X, 32 - (n), n)
+
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * If you have 32 registers or more, the compiler can (and should)
+ * try to change the array[] accesses into registers. However, on
+ * machines with less than ~25 registers, that won't really work,
+ * and at least gcc will make an unholy mess of it.
+ *
+ * So to avoid that mess which just slows things down, we force
+ * the stores to memory to actually happen (we might be better off
+ * with a 'W(t)=(val);asm("":"+m" (W(t))' there instead, as
+ * suggested by Artur Skawina - that will also make gcc unable to
+ * try to do the silly "optimize away loads" part because it won't
+ * see what the value will be).
+ *
+ * Ben Herrenschmidt reports that on PPC, the C version comes close
+ * to the optimized asm with this (ie on PPC you don't want that
+ * 'volatile', since there are lots of registers).
+ *
+ * On ARM we get the best code generation by forcing a full memory barrier
+ * between each SHA_ROUND, otherwise gcc happily get wild with spilling and
+ * the stack frame size simply explode and performance goes down the drain.
+ */
+
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
+#define setW(x, val) (*(volatile unsigned int *)&W(x) = (val))
+#elif defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__arm__)
+#define setW(x, val) \
+ do { \
+ W(x) = (val); \
+ __asm__("" :: : "memory"); \
+ } while (0)
+#else
+#define setW(x, val) (W(x) = (val))
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * Performance might be improved if the CPU architecture is OK with
+ * unaligned 32-bit loads and a fast ntohl() is available.
+ * Otherwise fall back to byte loads and shifts which is portable,
+ * and is faster on architectures with memory alignment issues.
+ */
+
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || \
+ defined(_M_IX86) || defined(_M_X64) || \
+ defined(__ppc__) || defined(__ppc64__) || \
+ defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__powerpc64__) || \
+ defined(__s390__) || defined(__s390x__)
+
+#define get_be32(p) ntohl(*(unsigned int *)(p))
+#define put_be32(p, v) \
+ do { \
+ *(unsigned int *)(p) = htonl(v); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#else
+
+#define get_be32(p) ( \
+ (*((unsigned char *)(p) + 0) << 24) | \
+ (*((unsigned char *)(p) + 1) << 16) | \
+ (*((unsigned char *)(p) + 2) << 8) | \
+ (*((unsigned char *)(p) + 3) << 0))
+#define put_be32(p, v) \
+ do { \
+ unsigned int __v = (v); \
+ *((unsigned char *)(p) + 0) = __v >> 24; \
+ *((unsigned char *)(p) + 1) = __v >> 16; \
+ *((unsigned char *)(p) + 2) = __v >> 8; \
+ *((unsigned char *)(p) + 3) = __v >> 0; \
+ } while (0)
+
+#endif
+
+/* This "rolls" over the 512-bit array */
+#define W(x) (array[(x) & 15])
+
+/*
+ * Where do we get the source from? The first 16 iterations get it from
+ * the input data, the next mix it from the 512-bit array.
+ */
+#define SHA_SRC(t) get_be32((unsigned char *)block + (t) * 4)
+#define SHA_MIX(t) SHA_ROL(W((t) + 13) ^ W((t) + 8) ^ W((t) + 2) ^ W(t), 1);
+
+#define SHA_ROUND(t, input, fn, constant, A, B, C, D, E) \
+ do { \
+ unsigned int TEMP = input(t); \
+ setW(t, TEMP); \
+ E += TEMP + SHA_ROL(A, 5) + (fn) + (constant); \
+ B = SHA_ROR(B, 2); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define T_0_15(t, A, B, C, D, E) SHA_ROUND(t, SHA_SRC, (((C ^ D) & B) ^ D), 0x5a827999, A, B, C, D, E)
+#define T_16_19(t, A, B, C, D, E) SHA_ROUND(t, SHA_MIX, (((C ^ D) & B) ^ D), 0x5a827999, A, B, C, D, E)
+#define T_20_39(t, A, B, C, D, E) SHA_ROUND(t, SHA_MIX, (B ^ C ^ D), 0x6ed9eba1, A, B, C, D, E)
+#define T_40_59(t, A, B, C, D, E) SHA_ROUND(t, SHA_MIX, ((B &C) + (D &(B ^ C))), 0x8f1bbcdc, A, B, C, D, E)
+#define T_60_79(t, A, B, C, D, E) SHA_ROUND(t, SHA_MIX, (B ^ C ^ D), 0xca62c1d6, A, B, C, D, E)
+
+static void blk_SHA1_Block(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx, const void *block)
+{
+ unsigned int A, B, C, D, E;
+ unsigned int array[16];
+
+ A = ctx->H[0];
+ B = ctx->H[1];
+ C = ctx->H[2];
+ D = ctx->H[3];
+ E = ctx->H[4];
+
+ /* Round 1 - iterations 0-16 take their input from 'block' */
+ T_0_15(0, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_0_15(1, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_0_15(2, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_0_15(3, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_0_15(4, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_0_15(5, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_0_15(6, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_0_15(7, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_0_15(8, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_0_15(9, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_0_15(10, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_0_15(11, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_0_15(12, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_0_15(13, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_0_15(14, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_0_15(15, A, B, C, D, E);
+
+ /* Round 1 - tail. Input from 512-bit mixing array */
+ T_16_19(16, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_16_19(17, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_16_19(18, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_16_19(19, B, C, D, E, A);
+
+ /* Round 2 */
+ T_20_39(20, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_20_39(21, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_20_39(22, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_20_39(23, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_20_39(24, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_20_39(25, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_20_39(26, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_20_39(27, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_20_39(28, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_20_39(29, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_20_39(30, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_20_39(31, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_20_39(32, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_20_39(33, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_20_39(34, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_20_39(35, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_20_39(36, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_20_39(37, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_20_39(38, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_20_39(39, B, C, D, E, A);
+
+ /* Round 3 */
+ T_40_59(40, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_40_59(41, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_40_59(42, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_40_59(43, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_40_59(44, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_40_59(45, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_40_59(46, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_40_59(47, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_40_59(48, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_40_59(49, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_40_59(50, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_40_59(51, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_40_59(52, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_40_59(53, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_40_59(54, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_40_59(55, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_40_59(56, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_40_59(57, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_40_59(58, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_40_59(59, B, C, D, E, A);
+
+ /* Round 4 */
+ T_60_79(60, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_60_79(61, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_60_79(62, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_60_79(63, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_60_79(64, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_60_79(65, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_60_79(66, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_60_79(67, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_60_79(68, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_60_79(69, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_60_79(70, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_60_79(71, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_60_79(72, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_60_79(73, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_60_79(74, B, C, D, E, A);
+ T_60_79(75, A, B, C, D, E);
+ T_60_79(76, E, A, B, C, D);
+ T_60_79(77, D, E, A, B, C);
+ T_60_79(78, C, D, E, A, B);
+ T_60_79(79, B, C, D, E, A);
+
+ ctx->H[0] += A;
+ ctx->H[1] += B;
+ ctx->H[2] += C;
+ ctx->H[3] += D;
+ ctx->H[4] += E;
+}
+
+void blk_SHA1_Init(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx)
+{
+ ctx->size = 0;
+
+ /* Initialize H with the magic constants (see FIPS180 for constants) */
+ ctx->H[0] = 0x67452301;
+ ctx->H[1] = 0xefcdab89;
+ ctx->H[2] = 0x98badcfe;
+ ctx->H[3] = 0x10325476;
+ ctx->H[4] = 0xc3d2e1f0;
+}
+
+void blk_SHA1_Update(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx, const void *data, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned int lenW = ctx->size & 63;
+
+ ctx->size += len;
+
+ /* Read the data into W and process blocks as they get full */
+ if (lenW) {
+ unsigned int left = 64 - lenW;
+ if (len < left)
+ left = len;
+ memcpy(lenW + (char *)ctx->W, data, left);
+ lenW = (lenW + left) & 63;
+ len -= left;
+ data = ((const char *)data + left);
+ if (lenW)
+ return;
+ blk_SHA1_Block(ctx, ctx->W);
+ }
+ while (len >= 64) {
+ blk_SHA1_Block(ctx, data);
+ data = ((const char *)data + 64);
+ len -= 64;
+ }
+ if (len)
+ memcpy(ctx->W, data, len);
+}
+
+void blk_SHA1_Final(unsigned char hashout[20], blk_SHA_CTX *ctx)
+{
+ static const unsigned char pad[64] = { 0x80 };
+ unsigned int padlen[2];
+ int i;
+
+ /* Pad with a binary 1 (ie 0x80), then zeroes, then length */
+ padlen[0] = htonl((uint32_t)(ctx->size >> 29));
+ padlen[1] = htonl((uint32_t)(ctx->size << 3));
+
+ i = ctx->size & 63;
+ blk_SHA1_Update(ctx, pad, 1 + (63 & (55 - i)));
+ blk_SHA1_Update(ctx, padlen, 8);
+
+ /* Output hash */
+ for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
+ put_be32(hashout + i * 4, ctx->H[i]);
+}